[2015] KEHC 2691 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 2691 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff failed to attend the hearing of the application for a temporary injunction on the scheduled date, despite the matter having been fixed by consent. In the absence of the applicant or any explanation for non-attendance, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 2691 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Issa Adam Bachoo (suing as legal Administrator of the Estate of Haji Taib Umar (Deceased)); Defendant: Muktar Abdul Wahab; Defendant: Fatuma Abdul Wahab
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 201 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
application dismissed for non-appearance
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Ownership Disputes, Apportionment of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Temporary Injunctions Ownership Disputes Apportionment of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Issa Adam Bachoo (suing as legal Administrator of the Estate of Haji Taib Umar (Deceased))

Plaintiff

Muktar Abdul Wahab

Defendant

Fatuma Abdul Wahab

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with plot No.166 Wabera Isiolo township pending determination of the application.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be dismissed due to non-appearance of the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff failed to attend the hearing of the application for a temporary injunction on the scheduled date, despite the matter having been fixed by consent. In the absence of the applicant or any explanation for non-attendance, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the application. The dismissal was made with costs to be in the cause, reflecting the procedural default rather than a determination on the merits of the substantive dispute over the land.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for non-appearance

Orders

  • The plaintiff's application dated 24th July 2013 is dismissed with costs to be in the cause.