[2020] KEHC 4498 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 4498 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had sufficiently demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of arrest by identifying the relevant police station and investigating officer. The court determined that granting anticipatory bail would not prejudice the respondents and was necessary to protect the applicant's liberty...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 4498 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Issak Ibrahim Kambi; Respondent: Republic; Respondent: County Criminal Investigations Officer; Respondent: Zamzam Construction Company; Respondent: Omar Hussein Ibrahim
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 170 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Anticipatory Bail
Outcome
anticipatory bail granted to applicant; interim orders issued
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Anticipatory Bail, Personal Bond, Arrest and Detention, Criminal Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Anticipatory Bail Personal Bond Arrest and Detention Criminal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Issak Ibrahim Kambi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

County Criminal Investigations Officer

Respondent

Zamzam Construction Company

Respondent

Omar Hussein Ibrahim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Anticipatory Bail

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail to prevent possible arrest by the respondents.
  2. 2 Whether there is any prejudice to the respondents in granting anticipatory bail to the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had sufficiently demonstrated a reasonable apprehension of arrest by identifying the relevant police station and investigating officer. The court determined that granting anticipatory bail would not prejudice the respondents and was necessary to protect the applicant's liberty pending further investigation. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant anticipatory bail on personal bond terms, restraining the respondents from arresting or detaining the applicant during the pendency of the bond, and directed the applicant to present himself to the investigating officer.

Court Disposition

anticipatory bail granted to applicant; interim orders issued

Orders

  • Applicant may be on an anticipatory personal bond of Ksh.1,000,000.
  • The 1st and 2nd Respondents are restrained from arresting or detaining the applicant over this issue during the pendency of this bond.