[2013] KEHC 6116 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 6116 (KLR)

The court found that although the parties had filed a consent on liability, it had not yet been adopted as an order of the court. The court therefore entered an order in terms of the consent and granted leave to compromise the suit on behalf of the minor, subject to the investment proposal submitted. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 6116 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: J I K (suing as the next friend of J W I, a Minor); Defendant: AL HAG HOLDINGS LIMITED
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 75 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Compromise Suit on Behalf of Minor
Outcome
Application allowed; leave granted to compromise suit on behalf of minor; consent on liability adopted; investment proposal approved.
Judges
DW Mbuteti
Legal Topics
Compromise of Suit, Minor Suing Through Next Friend, Court Approval of Settlement
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Compromise of Suit Minor Suing Through Next Friend Court Approval of Settlement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J I K (suing as the next friend of J W I, a Minor)

Plaintiff

AL HAG HOLDINGS LIMITED

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application for Leave to Compromise Suit on Behalf of Minor

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant leave to compromise the suit on behalf of the minor plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the consent filed by the parties on liability should be adopted as an order of the court.
  3. 3 Whether the proposed investment of the minor's award is appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the parties had filed a consent on liability, it had not yet been adopted as an order of the court. The court therefore entered an order in terms of the consent and granted leave to compromise the suit on behalf of the minor, subject to the investment proposal submitted. The court emphasized the necessity of judicial oversight in settlements involving minors to safeguard their interests, and directed that the minor's award be invested as proposed. Costs of the application were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; leave granted to compromise suit on behalf of minor; consent on liability adopted; investment proposal approved.

Orders

  • Order entered in terms of the consent dated 30th January and filed on 20th February 2012.
  • Leave granted to compromise the suit on behalf of the minor plaintiff.