[2014] KEHC 7351 (KLR)
The court found that since paternity was no longer in dispute, the appellant was under a legal obligation to pay the outstanding school fees for the minor. The appellant's argument regarding lack of documentation was rejected, as he could independently verify the arrears with the school. The court emphasized that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7351 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: J K L; Respondent: D C (suing through Guardian Litem D S. K)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 66 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Child Maintenance, School Fees Obligation, Parental Responsibility
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J K L
Appellant
D C (suing through Guardian Litem D S. K)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be compelled to pay outstanding primary school fees for the minor.
- 2 Whether the appellant's contestation of the claimed arrears is valid in light of established paternity.
- 3 Whether the appellant's parental responsibilities include payment of the claimed school fees.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since paternity was no longer in dispute, the appellant was under a legal obligation to pay the outstanding school fees for the minor. The appellant's argument regarding lack of documentation was rejected, as he could independently verify the arrears with the school. The court emphasized that parental responsibility includes payment of school fees and that the appellant's contestation of the amount did not absolve him of this duty. Accordingly, the application was allowed, and the appellant was ordered to pay all outstanding fees and dues at the minor's primary school, as well as to continue providing for the minor's further fees and upkeep as previously directed by...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The appellant J K L is ordered to forthwith pay all outstanding fees and dues owing at [particulars withheld] Academy on account of the minor.
- The appellant is to cater for the minor's further fees and upkeep as directed by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 66 OF 2013
J K L.....................................................................................APPELLANT
VS
D S. K(Suing through Gurdian Litem)
D C....................................................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
The applicant D C has filed the application dated 16/01/14 under certificate of urgency. In the application, she wants the appellant ordered to pay outstanding fees for the minor D K who sat his KCPE examinations last year at [particulars withheld] Academy. The applicant has stated that the minor passed with flying colours and is hoping to join Secondary School. The minor cannot however get his result slip and may not join secondary school, because the Primary school needs to be paid Kshs.49,900/= so as to clear the minor.
The appellant has filed a Replying Affidavit to respond to the application. He has averred that he is willing to pay the secondary school fees and has contested the primary school fees said to be owed. He has alluded to a professional undertaking given by the former advocates of the applicant and has stated that since she has fired her counsel, the undertaking can no longer stand.
Mr. Mutai for the respondent in his submissions, stated that the appellant no longer denies paternity. He further submitted that the applicant has not provided to the appellant proper documents showing the fees arrears.
I have perused the record and considered the application and the response thereto. This suit was originally filed before the children's court in Eldoret. I think paternity was disputed and the trial court made an order for DNA to be conducted. There were also orders issued for the defendant (appellant), to pay school fees and maintenance.
The defendant appealed. From the memorandum of Appeal, I think that the appellant was only contesting the order directing that DNA be conducted. He also filed an application for stay, which was allowed. Later, the parties agreed by consent to have DNA conducted, and Ms. Isiaho, then acting for the applicant, gave an undertaking to refund the costs of the DNA, if at all they showed that the appellant is not the father of D K the minor.
As earlier mentioned, Mr. Mutai in his submissions advised that paternity is no longer in dispute. If that is the case, the appellant must continue shouldering his parental responsibilities which include payment of school fees for the minor. The excuse that the applicant (mother to the minor) has not furnished documents for pending school fees to me does not wash. The appellant can as well go to the school and find out for himself the pending school fees, if he is contesting the figure of Kshs.49,900/= claimed by the applicant.
I see no reason why I should decline to allow this application. The application is hereby allowed. I order the appellant, J K L to forthwith pay all outstanding fees and dues owing at [particulars withheld] Academy on account of the minor herein. The appellant ought also to cater for the minor's further fees and upkeep as directed by the trial court.
May this matter be mentioned on 27/1/2014 to ascertain whether the appellant has complied with this order.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT ELDORET THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014
JUSTICE MUNYAO SILA
HIGH COURT AT ELDORET
Delivered in the presence of:
The appellant – acting in person.