[2016] KEHC 4691 (KLR)
The court found that the limited grant of letters of administration ad litem issued to the respondents was obtained through concealment of the existence of the applicant, who is a widow of the deceased and therefore ranks higher in law for purposes of administration than the 2nd respondent, the deceased's mother....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 4691 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: J V W N; Respondent: A N M; Respondent: N W K
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 292 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
- Outcome
- application for revocation of grant allowed; applicant and 1st respondent appointed joint administratrixes for litigation purposes
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Grant, Letters of Administration, Priority of Administration, Concealment of Material Facts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J V W N
Applicant
A N M
Respondent
N W K
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Summons for Revocation of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the limited grant of letters of administration was obtained through concealment of material facts.
- 2 Whether the applicant, as a widow, ranks in priority over the 2nd respondent for purposes of administration of the estate.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to be appointed as joint administratrix of the estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the limited grant of letters of administration ad litem issued to the respondents was obtained through concealment of the existence of the applicant, who is a widow of the deceased and therefore ranks higher in law for purposes of administration than the 2nd respondent, the deceased's mother. The absence of any response from the respondents meant the applicant's facts were uncontested. The court held that under Section 66 of the Law of Succession Act, the applicant is entitled to be appointed as joint administratrix together with the 1st respondent, limited to the purposes of litigation. The court exercised its power under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act to...
Court Disposition
application for revocation of grant allowed; applicant and 1st respondent appointed joint administratrixes for litigation purposes
Orders
- The limited grant of letters of administration ad litem issued on 8th June, 2015 to A N M and N W K is revoked.
- J V W N and A N M are appointed joint administratrixes of the estate of R K M alias R K M, limited to the purposes of litigation only.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 292 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF R K M R M K (DECEASED)
J V W N...........................................................APPLICANT
AND
A N M……………………..….……………1ST RESPONDENT
N W K......................................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. J V W N the applicant herein has taken out Summons for Revocation of Grant dated 23rd July, 2015 seeking to revoke the limited grant of letters of administration Ad Litem to the estate of R K M ALIAS R K M (Deceased) issued on 8th June 2015 to A N M and N W K , the respondents herein.
2. The grounds upon which revocation of grant was sought were as follows:
i. That the applicant is also a widow to the deceased herein.
ii. That the grant was obtained through concealment of material facts.
iii. That the applicant ranks in priority to the 2nd respondent, N W K who is said to be a mother to the deceased.
3. In her supporting affidavit, the applicant through counsel M/S Wanyonyi & Muhia Advocate exhibited a birth certificate “JVN3” showing that the deceased was the father to C N born on 18th April, 2014. The applicant deposed that she got married to the deceased under Kikuyu Customary Law in 2010 and became the 2nd wife of the deceased after the 1st respondent. She has contended that the respondents are well aware of this fact and the fact that they were living together as man and wife with the deceased.
4. The applicant asked this Court to revoke the grant so that the two of them can be appointed as joint administratrixes to pursue litigation on behalf of the estate and ensure that her interest and that of the child will be catered for.
5. The respondents did not file any response to the application and therefore the facts presented by the applicant are uncontested. It is therefore clear that there was material concealment of true facts in regard to the existence of the applicant as the 2nd widow. Mr Ngigi counsel for the respondent pointed out that the only issue he had with the application was that directions were not taken prior to the hearing of the application. However, directions are usually given under Rule 44 of the Probate and Administration Rules when the Summons for revocation of grant is opposed. Furthermore when the court is made aware of concealment or inadvertent mistake when issuing a grant, a court is empowered under Section 76 of the Law of Succession Act to revoke the grant even on its motion.
This Court finds that the limited grant of letters of administrationAd Litem issued on 8th June, 2015 to A N M and N W K , was obtained through concealment of the existence of the 2nd widow, the applicant herein who ranks higher in law in the administration of the estate than the 2nd respondent. Under Section 66 of the Law of Succession Act this Court finds that she is entitled to be appointed joint administratrix together with A N M. The two are hereby appointed joint administratrixes of the estate of the late R K M Alias R M K limited to the purposes of litigation only. It is so ordered.
Dated and delivered at Kerugoya this 16th day of June, 2016.
R. K. LIMO
JUDGE
16. 6.2016
Before Hon. Justice R. Limo J.,
Court Assistant Willy Mwangi
Ann Ngima present
Nancy Wakera Kinyua present
Ngigi for Respondent absent
Wanyonyi for applicant absent
COURT: Ruling signed, dated and delivered in the open court in the presence of respondents and in the absence of Wanyonyi for applicant and Ngigi advocate for respondents.
R. K. LIMO
16. 6.2016