[2016] KEELC 449 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction. The plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence showed that she did not execute any transfer or appear before the Land Control Board for consent, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of the transfer to the 1st...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEELC 449 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jacinta Wanjiru Mwenga; 1st Defendant: Samwel Theuri; 2nd Defendant: Loise Wangare Ratemo; 3rd Defendant: District Land Registrar Naivasha; 4th Defendant: The Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 69 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application for Injunction
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Orders granted to preserve the suit property pending determination of the suit.
- Judges
- MA Silau
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Transfer, Injunctive Relief, Title Inhibition
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacinta Wanjiru Mwenga
Plaintiff
Samwel Theuri
1st Defendant
Loise Wangare Ratemo
2nd Defendant
District Land Registrar Naivasha
3rd Defendant
The Attorney General
4th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Interlocutory Application for Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction to restrain dealings with the suit property pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether the transfer of the suit property to the 1st defendant was fraudulent and without the plaintiff's consent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for the grant of an injunction. The plaintiff's uncontroverted evidence showed that she did not execute any transfer or appear before the Land Control Board for consent, raising serious questions about the legitimacy of the transfer to the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant failed to rebut these allegations. The court determined that the orders sought were limited to preservation of the title and did not prejudice the defendants at this stage. Accordingly, the court granted an order restraining the 1st defendant from dealing with the suit property and issued an inhibition against any further registration of dispositions...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Orders granted to preserve the suit property pending determination of the suit.
Orders
- The 1st defendant is restrained from selling, charging, leasing, or in any other way dealing with land parcel Miti Mingi/Mbaruk Block 5/633 (Kianjoya) pending hearing and determination of this suit.
- An order of inhibition is issued, inhibiting the registration of any disposition in the register of the said land pending hearing and determination of this suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
ELC NO 69 OF 2016
JACINTA WANJIRU MWENGA………......……...………PLAINTIF
VERSUS
SAMWEL THEURI…………………...................……..1ST DEFENDANT
LOISE WANGARE RATEMO…….……................….2ND DEFENDANT
DISTRICT LAND REGISTRAR NAIVASHA…….........3RD DEFENDANT
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ……….................….….4TH DEFENDANT
RULING
(Application to stop dealings on property; plaintiff having been the initial registered owner; property now in name of 1st defendant; plaintiff claiming that the land was transferred to 1st defendant by way of fraud; no response by the 1st defendant; prima facie case established; orders to preserve the title issued)
1. This suit was commenced by way of a plaint which was filed on 4 March 2016. In the plaint, it is pleaded that the plaintiff is the legitimate owner of the land parcel Miti Mingi / Mbaruk Block 5/633 (Kianjoya). In the year 2012, the plaintiff borrowed a friendly loan from the 1st defendant of Kshs. 70,000/= to be repaid with an interest of 30%. It was agreed that as a sign of good faith she would deposit her title deed with the 1st defendant. The plaintiff however became sickly and was unable to pay the debt within time and it is pleaded that the parties mutually agreed to extend the time for repayment. In the year 2015, the 2nd defendant came to the premises purporting that the land belongs to her having purchased it from the 1st defendant. On investigations, the plaintiff discovered that the 1st defendant had transferred the suit land to his name. It is her view that this was done fraudulently. In the suit, the plaintiff seeks a declaration that she is the legitimate owner of the suit land, and an order to cancel the title of the 1st defendant.
2. Together with the suit, the plaintiff filed an application to restrain the 1st defendant from dealing, disposing off, transferring, charging, alienating or in any other way interfering with the suit property, pending hearing and determination of the suit.
3. The 1st defendant did not file anything to oppose the application. It emerged in the course of the proceedings that there was another suit being Nakuru CMCC No. 2 of 2016, Loise Wangare Ratemo vs Samwel Mwangi Theuri and Jacinta Wanjiru. The plaintiff in that case is the 2nd defendant herein. The two defendants are the 1st defendant and plaintiff in this suit respectively. In that suit, the said Loise is seeking an order of specific performance to enforce an agreement that she had with Samwel Mwangi over the sale of the suit land.
4. In her suit, the plaintiff has averred that there is no way the property could have been lawfully transferred to Samwel since she never executed any instrument of transfer. She has also asserted that she never appeared before any Land Control Board for consent.
5. As I mentioned, Samwel has not refuted these allegations by filing a rebuttal. In my view the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case. I note that the application as drawn only seek orders to preserve the title and nothing more. I do allow the application and order the 1st defendant not to sell, charge, lease, or in any other way deal with the land parcel Miti Mingi/Mbaruk Block 5/633 (Kianjoya) pending hearing and determination of this suit. I also issue an order of inhibition, inhibiting the registration of any disposition in the register of the said land pending hearing and determination of this suit.
6. The costs of this application will be shouldered by the 1st defendant.
7. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 21st day of September 2016.
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT NAKURU
In presence of :-
Ms. Alwala holding brief for Mr. Githui for 2nd defendant
No appearance on part of Mrs Mukira for plaintiff/applicant
No Appearance on part of 1st, 3rd and 4th defendant
C/Asst. Janet
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT NAKURU