[2005] KECA 219 (KLR)
The Court of Appeal held that the appellant's repeated attempts to litigate the same matter were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The court emphasized that the issue had already been conclusively determined by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal in previous proceedings. The appellant's argument...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KECA 219 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jack Mathagu Muriuki; Respondent: Njagi Samson
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 87 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Jurisdiction, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jack Mathagu Muriuki
Appellant
Njagi Samson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's suit is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.
- 2 Whether issues of jurisdiction could be raised after previous determinations.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the appellant's repeated attempts to litigate the same matter were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The court emphasized that the issue had already been conclusively determined by both the High Court and the Court of Appeal in previous proceedings. The appellant's argument regarding lack of jurisdiction of the magistrates was found to be misplaced, as such objections should have been raised during the earlier proceedings before Tunoi, J and the Court of Appeal in 1994. The court reiterated that irrespective of how many times the appellant brought the matter to court, it would be dismissed on the ground of res judicata. Accordingly, the appeal was...
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NYERI
CORAM: OMOLO, O’KUBASU & GITHINJI, JJ.A
Civil Appeal 87 of 2001
BETWEEN
JACK MATHAGU MURIUKI ……………………………………APPELLANT
AND
NJAGI SAMSON………………………………………………...RESPONDENT
(Appeal from a ruling & Order of the High Court of Kenya at Nyeri (Juma, J) dated 22/2/2001 in H.C.C.C NO. 233 OF 1994) *****************
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
As far back as 25th April, 1991, Tunoi, J. as he then was, told this appellant or those through whom she claimed that the suit which was repeatedly being brought in various counts wasres judicata. There was an appeal to this Court and in confirming the decision of Tunoi, J this Court stated as follows:-
“It is clear that were the appellant filed her suit at Embu in 1982, 10 years after the dismissal of her suit on same issue filed at Nyeri in 1973, the matter was already res judicata. The learned Judge rightly allowed the respondent’s appeal. There is no merit in this appeal and we, therefore dismiss it with costs to the respondent against the appellant.”
After this it appears that the appellant again went back to the High Court over the same matter. Juma, J, told her the matter wasre judicata. She now comes to this Court over the same matter. We must again tell the appellant as we told her in 1994, that the matter is res judicata. Even if the magistrates who dealt with the matter had no jurisdiction, the proper place to have raised those issues was before Tunoi, J and this Court when it gave its judgment in 1994. We must once again tell the appellant that this matter isres judicata and irrespective of the number of times it is brought to court it will be dismissed on the same ground. We order that this appeal be and is hereby dismissed with costs to the respondent.
DATED and DELIVERED at NYERI this 20th day of May, 2005.
R.S.C. OMOLO ............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E.O. O’KUBASU ...................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E.M. GITHINJI ...............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR