[2019] KEELC 1842 (KLR)
The court found that the notice to show cause was addressed and served to the parties in person and not to their counsel on record, contrary to the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules. This procedural lapse was deemed sufficient to set aside the dismissal order made for want of prosecution. The court further...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELC 1842 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Jackob Nyakwa Ojwang (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of the late Augustine Ojwang Okut); Defendant: Alfred Oremo Okola
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 263 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
- Outcome
- Application allowed; suit reinstated; costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement of Suit, Service of Process, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Estate Litigation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jackob Nyakwa Ojwang (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of the late Augustine Ojwang Okut)
Plaintiff
Alfred Oremo Okola
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the notice to show cause was served upon counsel on record for the plaintiff.
- 2 Whether the dismissal order should be set aside and the suit reinstated.
- 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the notice to show cause was addressed and served to the parties in person and not to their counsel on record, contrary to the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules. This procedural lapse was deemed sufficient to set aside the dismissal order made for want of prosecution. The court further noted that the issue of the defendant's alleged death prior to the institution of the suit was disputed and left it open for the parties to address through appropriate applications. Consequently, the court allowed the application to set aside the dismissal and reinstated the suit, with costs in the cause.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; suit reinstated; costs in the cause.
Orders
- The plaintiff's Motion dated 8th August, 2018 is allowed in terms of prayer 1 and 2.
- The orders of dismissal issued on 12th February, 2018 are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL AND LAND COURT AT KISUMU
ELC NO. 263 OF 2013
JACKOB NYAKWA OJWANG (Suing as the legal
representative of the Estate of the late
AUGUSTINE OJWANG OKUT...................PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
ALFRED OREMO OKOLA.................DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Motion dated 8th August, 2018 seeks for the court to review, set aside, and or vacate the orders issued on the 12th February, 2018 for dismissal of the suit for non-attendance, and the suit be reinstated for hearing and determination. The application is based on four (4) grounds on its face and supported by the affidavit of Gerald O. Kimanga Advocate sworn on the 8th August, 2018, among others deponing that he was not served with the dismissal notice as alleged on the 8th February, 2018 and hence did not know that he was required to come to court on the 12th February, 2018. The application is also supported by the further affidavit sworn by Jackob Nyakwa Ojwang, the plaintiff, on the 25th February, 2019 among others deponing that if the defendant is indeed dead, the suit can still be maintained against his estate.
2. The application is opposed by the defendant though the four (4) grounds of opposition dated 11th October, 2018 that the suit is incapable of being reinstated; that the defendant passed on the 28th February, 2013 as per certificate of death No. 0045660; among others.
3. The learned counsel for the plaintiff and defendant filed the written submissions dated the 25th February, 2019 and 26th June, 2019 respectively.
4. The issues for determination by the court are as follows:
a. Whether the notice to show cause was served upon counsel on record for the plaintiff.
b. What order to issue
c. Who pays the costs.
5. The court has considered the grounds on the motion and of opposition; supporting and further affidavitS; the pleadings, submissions and record; and come to the following findings;
a. That the suit was commenced by the plaintiff in person through the plaint dated the 25th September, 2013 and filed on the 14th April, 2014 against Alfred Oremo Okola. That the plaintiff has indicated his postal address as P. O. Box 959 Kisumu in all documents filed by himself, including the amended plaint dated 3rd September, 2014.
b. That M/s Kirenga & Company Advocates filed notice of appointment of advocate dated the 21st January, 2015 for the defendant, while Ms. Kimanga & Company Advocates filed their notice of appointment of advocate dated the 11th February, 2019.
c. That the Notice to show cause under Order 17 Rule 2 of Civil Procedure Rules dated the 25th January, 2018 that was coming up for hearing on the 12th February, 2018 when the suit was dismissed for want of prosecution was addressed to the plaintiff and defendant in person and not to their counsel on record. That though the notice was correctly addressed to the Postal address provided by the plaintiff and posted through the mail registry, the failure to serve, counsel on record is sufficient ground for the order made on the 12th February, 2018 to be set aside, now that the plaintiff has moved the court.
d. That the defendant who allegedly died on the 15th February, 2013 before this suit was filed has a counsel on record. That as the plaintiff has disputed the said death, the matter will be left at that for the parties to move the court as appropriate.
6. That flowing from the foregoing, the court allows the plaintiff’s Motion dated the 8th August, 2018 in terms of prayer 1 and 2 with costs in the cause.
It is so ordered.
S. M. KIBUNJA
ENVIRONMENT & LAND - JUDGE
DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019.
In presence of;
Plaintiff Absent
Defendant Absent
Counsel Absent
S.M. KIBUNJA
ENVIRONMENT & LAND – JUDGE