[2019] KEELC 1842 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 1842 (KLR)

The court found that the notice to show cause was addressed and served to the parties in person and not to their counsel on record, contrary to the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules. This procedural lapse was deemed sufficient to set aside the dismissal order made for want of prosecution. The court further...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 1842 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jackob Nyakwa Ojwang (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of the late Augustine Ojwang Okut); Defendant: Alfred Oremo Okola
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 263 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Outcome
Application allowed; suit reinstated; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Service of Process, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Estate Litigation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Reinstatement of Suit Service of Process Dismissal for Non Attendance Estate Litigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackob Nyakwa Ojwang (Suing as the legal representative of the Estate of the late Augustine Ojwang Okut)

Plaintiff

Alfred Oremo Okola

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit

  1. 1 Whether the notice to show cause was served upon counsel on record for the plaintiff.
  2. 2 Whether the dismissal order should be set aside and the suit reinstated.
  3. 3 Who should bear the costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the notice to show cause was addressed and served to the parties in person and not to their counsel on record, contrary to the requirements of the Civil Procedure Rules. This procedural lapse was deemed sufficient to set aside the dismissal order made for want of prosecution. The court further noted that the issue of the defendant's alleged death prior to the institution of the suit was disputed and left it open for the parties to address through appropriate applications. Consequently, the court allowed the application to set aside the dismissal and reinstated the suit, with costs in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; suit reinstated; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's Motion dated 8th August, 2018 is allowed in terms of prayer 1 and 2.
  • The orders of dismissal issued on 12th February, 2018 are set aside.