[2019] KEELC 4116 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4116 (KLR)

The court found that, given the nature of the application and the lapse of the Gazette Notice's time frame, it was more appropriate to certify the application as urgent and direct that it be served upon the respondents for an inter-partes hearing. The court declined to grant a stay of the implementation of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4116 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jackson Ekaru Nakusa & 32 Others; Respondent: National Land Commission; Respondent: The Attorney General; Respondent: County Government of Turkana
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 3 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application certified as urgent; no substantive orders granted at this stage.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Compulsory Acquisition, Gazette Notice Procedure, Urgent Applications
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Compulsory Acquisition Gazette Notice Procedure Urgent Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Ekaru Nakusa & 32 Others

Applicant

National Land Commission

Respondent

The Attorney General

Respondent

County Government of Turkana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the implementation of the National Land Commission's decision on compulsory acquisition should be stayed pending inter-partes hearing.
  2. 2 Whether the application meets the threshold for certification as urgent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, given the nature of the application and the lapse of the Gazette Notice's time frame, it was more appropriate to certify the application as urgent and direct that it be served upon the respondents for an inter-partes hearing. The court declined to grant a stay of the implementation of the National Land Commission's decision at this stage, emphasizing the importance of hearing both parties before making substantive orders. The urgency of the matter was recognized, but procedural fairness required that the respondents be given an opportunity to respond before any interim relief could be granted.

Court Disposition

Application certified as urgent; no substantive orders granted at this stage.

Orders

  • The application dated 11/3/2019 is certified as urgent.
  • The application shall be served upon the respondents within 2 days of this order.