[2012] KEHC 1143 (KLR)

[2012] KEHC 1143 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to be granted leave to commence contempt proceedings against the respondents. The affidavit evidence showed that the 1st respondent was served, and there was photographic evidence of ongoing construction on the suit property, which could amount...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2012] KEHC 1143 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jackson Esitika (suing as the administrator of the estate of Dora Okisa Munyama); Defendant: Nereah Andenyi; Defendant: Perus Amimo; Defendant: Leonard Indiatsi; Defendant: Henry Otieno Abwao
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 161 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings
Outcome
Leave to commence contempt proceedings granted.
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Leave to Institute Proceedings, Service of Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Leave to Institute Proceedings Service of Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Esitika (suing as the administrator of the estate of Dora Okisa Munyama)

Plaintiff

Nereah Andenyi

Defendant

Perus Amimo

Defendant

Leonard Indiatsi

Defendant

Henry Otieno Abwao

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Application for Leave to Commence Contempt Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to commence contempt proceedings against the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether service upon the 1st respondent alone is sufficient for the present application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to be granted leave to commence contempt proceedings against the respondents. The affidavit evidence showed that the 1st respondent was served, and there was photographic evidence of ongoing construction on the suit property, which could amount to contempt of court. The court held that the threshold for granting leave had been met, and any further issues raised by the respondents would be addressed at the substantive hearing of the contempt application. The court therefore granted prayer (1) of the application, allowing the applicant to institute contempt proceedings, with costs in the cause.

Court Disposition

Leave to commence contempt proceedings granted.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to institute contempt proceedings against the respondents.
  • Costs in the cause.