[2019] KEHC 7852 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 7852 (KLR)

The court found that Jackson Karoki Gichuhi was appointed by Kamere, not Lucy, to act as an estate agent to find a buyer for the property. However, Jackson admitted he was not a registered estate agent as required by Section 18 of the Estate Agents Act (Cap 533). Any contract for estate agency services by an...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 7852 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jackson Karoki Gichuhi; Defendant: Lucy Sompet Murero; Defendant: Vishura Developers Ltd.; Defendant: Dr. Hasmukh Dawda; Defendant: Imran Dhanji; Defendant: Joakim Kiarie Kamere
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 343 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Outcome
suit dismissed with costs to all defendants
Judges
MM Kasango
Legal Topics
Agency Contracts, Estate Agency Regulation, Professional Licensing, Illegality of Contracts
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Agency Contracts Estate Agency Regulation Professional Licensing Illegality of Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Karoki Gichuhi

Plaintiff

Lucy Sompet Murero

Defendant

Vishura Developers Ltd.

Defendant

Dr. Hasmukh Dawda

Defendant

Imran Dhanji

Defendant

Joakim Kiarie Kamere

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Was Jackson Karoki Gichuhi appointed as an agent or architect in respect to the property.
  2. 2 What are the legal ramifications of such appointment, particularly regarding entitlement to commission or fees.
  3. 3 Who bears the costs of the suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Jackson Karoki Gichuhi was appointed by Kamere, not Lucy, to act as an estate agent to find a buyer for the property. However, Jackson admitted he was not a registered estate agent as required by Section 18 of the Estate Agents Act (Cap 533). Any contract for estate agency services by an unregistered agent is illegal and unenforceable. Similarly, Jackson failed to prove he was engaged as an architect by Dawda or Vishura, and even if he had, he did not prove he was registered as required by Section 3 of the Architects and Quantity Surveyors Act (Cap 525). The court held that it cannot enforce illegal contracts, and Jackson's claims for commission and architectural fees...

Court Disposition

suit dismissed with costs to all defendants

Orders

  • The suit is dismissed with costs to all the defendants.