[2007] KECA 440 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicants satisfied both limbs required for the grant of stay under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The intended appeal was not frivolous and raised arguable points, particularly because Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya had already obtained a stay of the earlier contempt order, which...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KECA 440 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Rev. Jackson Kipkemboi; Applicant: Rev. Stephen M. Mwangi; Applicant: Rev. Josephat Kamau Nganga; Applicant: Rev. Eliud Karanja Wanyoike; Applicant: Rev. Enock K. Kiplagat; Applicant: Rev. Stephen Kiguru Kamau; Applicant: Rev. Stanley W. Kamau; Applicant: Rev. Samuel Wachira; Respondent: Rev. Samuel Muriithi Njogu; Respondent: Rev. Joseph Samoei; Respondent: Rev. Samuel M. Kathita; Respondent: Rev. Elijah Cheruiyot; Respondent: Rev. Wilfred Nyamu
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- ? 18 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Stay of execution granted. Immediate release of Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya ordered pending appeal.
- Judges
- AM Githinji, CA Otieno
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Stay of Execution, Appeals, Interlocutory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rev. Jackson Kipkemboi
Applicant
Rev. Stephen M. Mwangi
Applicant
Rev. Josephat Kamau Nganga
Applicant
Rev. Eliud Karanja Wanyoike
Applicant
Rev. Enock K. Kiplagat
Applicant
Rev. Stephen Kiguru Kamau
Applicant
Rev. Stanley W. Kamau
Applicant
Rev. Samuel Wachira
Applicant
Rev. Samuel Muriithi Njogu
Respondent
Rev. Joseph Samoei
Respondent
Rev. Samuel M. Kathita
Respondent
Rev. Elijah Cheruiyot
Respondent
Rev. Wilfred Nyamu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 2 Whether the committal of Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya for contempt should be stayed pending the determination of the intended appeal.
- 3 Whether the intended appeal is arguable and whether its outcome would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicants satisfied both limbs required for the grant of stay under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The intended appeal was not frivolous and raised arguable points, particularly because Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya had already obtained a stay of the earlier contempt order, which was the basis for the subsequent committal. Furthermore, the Court held that if stay was not granted, the appeal would be rendered nugatory as the sentence of 21 days' imprisonment would be served before the appeal could be heard. Accordingly, the Court allowed the application and ordered the immediate release of Mr. Ongoya pending the hearing and determination of the intended...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Stay of execution granted. Immediate release of Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya ordered pending appeal.
Orders
- There shall be a stay of execution of the orders of Hon. Lady Justice Mugo made on 6th February, 2007 committing Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya, Advocate.
- Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya, Advocate, shall be released from prison forthwith pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
43 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
Civ Appli 18 of 2007
REV. JACKSON KIPKEMBOI
REV. STEPHEN M. MWANGI
REV. JOSEPHAT KAMAU NGANGA
REV. ELIUD KARANJA WANYOIKE
REV. ENOCK K. KIPLAGAT
REV. STEPHEN KIGURU KAMAU
REV. STANLEY W. KAMAU
REV. SAMUEL WACHIRA ……………...............………………………...APPLICANTS
AND
REV. SAMUEL MURIITHI NJOGU
REV. JOSEPH SAMOEI
REV. SAMUEL M. KATHITA
REV. ELIJAH CHERUIYOT
REV. WILFRED NYAMU ………..........………………...............….RESPONDENTS
(An application for the release of Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya Advocate pursuant to the orders of (Hon. Justice Mugo) dated 6th February, 2007
In
H.C.C.C. NO. 1237 OF 1999)
*****************
RULING OF THE COURT
We have before us an application brought under certificate of urgency in which the applicant is seeking two main orders namely:-
“(b) That there be a stay or execution(sic) of the orders of Hon. Lady Justice Mugo made on 6th February, 2007 committing Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya, Advocate in HCCC No. 1237 of 1999 pursuant to her earlier orders in HCCC No. 1236 of 2004 hearing (sic) determination of the intended appeal.
(c) That the said Mr. Elisha Zebedee Ongoya Advocate be and is hereby released forthwith pending the hearing determination of intended appeal.”
The application is brought under rule 5 (2)(b) of this Court’s Rules (the Rules). That in effect means that the applicant has to demonstrate the now well known two principles namely first that the intended appeal is arguable i.e. is not frivolous. Secondly that the results of the intended appeal were it to succeed would be rendered nugatory if this application is not allowed.
Mr. Albert Khaminwa for the respondent does not oppose the application and rightly too. Elisha Zebedee is an advocate. In another suit HCCC No. 1236 of 1999 he had been held in contempt of the court by the same learned Judge. He applied to this Court in CA Nai. 311 of 2006 and we ordered stay of that order of the superior court. Armed with that order he rightly, in our view, appeared before the same Judge on 6th February, 2007 in HCCC 1237 of 1999 and after that matter was partly heard, the learned Judge on her own motion found him guilty on contempt of court on grounds that he did not purge the earlier contempt notwithstanding that a stay had been granted in respect of that earlier allegation and that that earlier allegation was subject of an intended appeal the decision of which might go either way. We on our view feel that the intended appeal is arguable and to that effect we agree with both learned counsel.
Elisha Zebedee Ongoya was sent to jail for 21 days. It is obvious that by the time his intended appeal will be heard, he will have served the sentence, hence the appeal even if it were to succeed the results will be rendered nugatory if we do not grant stay at this juncture.
We do allow the application and order that Elisha Zebedee Ongoya be released from prison forthwith till his intended appeal will be heard and decided.
As a parting shot, we feel being in control of a court should not amount to making it difficult for the parties before the Court to freely carry out their duties through fear.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 8th day of February, 2007.
E. O. O’KUBASU
……………………….
JUDGE OF APPEAL
E. M. GITHINJI
…………………………
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J. W. ONYANGO OTIENO
…………….…………..
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR