Nderitu v Repulic (Criminal Revision E137 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 5003 (KLR) (17 April 2026) (Ruling)
The trial court failed to comply with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code by not specifically directing that the applicant's sentence be reduced by the period spent in custody; therefore, the sentence must run from the date of arrest.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 5003 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jackson Maina Nderitu; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2026
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E137 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Pre Trial Detention Credit, Assault Causing Grievous Bodily Harm
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jackson Maina Nderitu
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in pre-trial detention should be factored into the applicant's sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial court failed to comply with Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code by not specifically directing that the applicant's sentence be reduced by the period spent in custody; therefore, the sentence must run from the date of arrest.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- The fifteen (15) year sentence imposed upon the applicant will run from 22nd July 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment