[2019] KEELC 3171 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 3171 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant, being the son of the respondent, had already been allocated another parcel of land (Abogeta/U-Kiringa/1283) and was not without a place to reside. The respondent, a 97-year-old man, was entitled to peaceful enjoyment of his property, and there was no evidence that he was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 3171 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jackson M’Rinyiru Mbui; Respondent: Silas M’Rinyiru Mbui
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 47 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Eviction, Ownership of Land, Family Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Stay of Execution Eviction Ownership of Land Family Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson M’Rinyiru Mbui

Appellant

Silas M’Rinyiru Mbui

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a stay of execution of the judgment in Nkubu PMCC NO. 9 of 2012 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant will suffer substantial loss if the stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent, as a 97-year-old registered owner, should be disturbed in possession of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant, being the son of the respondent, had already been allocated another parcel of land (Abogeta/U-Kiringa/1283) and was not without a place to reside. The respondent, a 97-year-old man, was entitled to peaceful enjoyment of his property, and there was no evidence that he was alienating the suit land. The court exercised its discretion against granting a stay, noting that the appellant would not suffer substantial loss as he had alternative accommodation. The application for stay of execution was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for stay of execution is dismissed.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.