[2017] KEELC 3861 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3861 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had been in open, continuous, and uninterrupted possession of the suit land for over 18 years, during which the respondent made no claim or attempt to assert ownership. The applicants provided evidence of their occupation and development of the land, which was not challenged or...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3861 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jackson Mwangombe Pugah and others; Respondent: Abdulla Bin Ali
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case Civil Suit 196 (O.S.) of 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the applicants
Judges
AA Omollo
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Limitation of Actions, Title Registration
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Limitation of Actions Title Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Mwangombe Pugah and others

Applicant

Abdulla Bin Ali

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have acquired title to the suit land by adverse possession.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's rights to the suit land have been extinguished under the Limitation of Actions Act.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to registration as proprietors of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had been in open, continuous, and uninterrupted possession of the suit land for over 18 years, during which the respondent made no claim or attempt to assert ownership. The applicants provided evidence of their occupation and development of the land, which was not challenged or rebutted by the respondent. Applying the principles from Wambugu v Njuguna and section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, the court held that the respondent's rights had been extinguished by operation of law, and the applicants had satisfied the requirements for adverse possession. The court therefore granted the orders sought for extinguishment of the respondent's title and...

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicants

Orders

  • The respondent's interest in the suit land is extinguished.
  • The applicants are entitled to be registered as proprietors of the suit land, either individually or in the name of Makubaliano Self-help Group-Junda.