[2017] KEELRC 1081 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 1081 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had been in open, continuous, and uninterrupted possession of the suit land for over 18 years, constructing houses and residing there with their families. The respondent, despite being served through newspaper advertisement, did not contest the suit or assert any rights over the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 1081 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Jackson Mwangombe Pugah and Others; Respondent: Abdulla Bin Ali
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 196 (O.S.) of 2012
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the applicants
Judges
AA Omollo, CK Yano
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Limitation of Actions, Title Extinguishment
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Limitation of Actions Title Extinguishment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jackson Mwangombe Pugah and Others

Applicant

Abdulla Bin Ali

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Originating Summons / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have acquired title to the suit land by adverse possession under the Limitation of Actions Act.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's rights to the suit land have been extinguished by operation of law.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to be registered as proprietors of the suit land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had been in open, continuous, and uninterrupted possession of the suit land for over 18 years, constructing houses and residing there with their families. The respondent, despite being served through newspaper advertisement, did not contest the suit or assert any rights over the land. The evidence, including the title deed and photographs of the applicants' occupation, was uncontroverted. Applying the principles from Wambugu v Njuguna and Section 7 of the Limitation of Actions Act, the court held that the respondent's rights had been extinguished by operation of law and that the applicants had satisfied the requirements for adverse possession. Judgment...

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicants

Orders

  • The respondent's interest in the suit land is extinguished.
  • The applicants are entitled to be registered as proprietors of the suit land, either individually or in the name of MAKUBALIANO SELF-HELP GROUP-JUNDA.