[2016] KEELC 1265 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 1265 (KLR)

The court found that the petitioner had demonstrated a credible threat to his constitutional rights, including fair administrative action and fair trial, arising from the respondents' actions in scheduling a secret election to remove him from office without notice or reasons. The court noted that the 1st...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 1265 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: Jacob Mantili Kang'ang'a; Respondent: The District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Igembe District; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 15 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Outcome
Interlocutory application partially allowed by consent; conservatory order granted.
Legal Topics
Fundamental Rights Enforcement, Fair Administrative Action, Right to Fair Trial, Land Adjudication Process
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Fundamental Rights Enforcement Fair Administrative Action Right to Fair Trial Land Adjudication Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jacob Mantili Kang'ang'a

Petitioner

The District Land Adjudication & Settlement Officer Igembe District

Respondent

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights to fair trial, fair administrative action, and equal protection of the law are threatened by the respondents' actions.
  2. 2 Whether the 1st respondent has the capacity to remove the petitioner from office as chairman of the committee.
  3. 3 Whether conservatory orders should issue to restrain the respondents from conducting the election pending determination of the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the petitioner had demonstrated a credible threat to his constitutional rights, including fair administrative action and fair trial, arising from the respondents' actions in scheduling a secret election to remove him from office without notice or reasons. The court noted that the 1st respondent's capacity to remove the petitioner was questionable, as the petitioner was elected by the committee. By consent of the parties, the court allowed the prayer restraining the respondents from conducting the election of the chairman of the committee of Amwathi 1B Adjudication Section pending the hearing and determination of the petition, thereby preserving the status quo and...

Court Disposition

Interlocutory application partially allowed by consent; conservatory order granted.

Orders

  • A conservatory order is issued restraining the 1st respondent and his officers, servants, agents, or any other person acting on his behalf from conducting an election of the chairman of the committee of Amwathi 1B Adjudication Section pending the hearing and determination of the petition or until further orders of...