[2001] KEHC 882 (KLR)
The court found that the appellants were positively identified as the persons who attacked and robbed the complainant. The identification was immediate, corroborated by the recovery of the stolen items, and supported by the testimony of both the complainant and police officers. The court was satisfied that there was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KEHC 882 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacob Mukunga; Appellant: Shem Abienda Omondi; Appellant: Stephen Mururi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 255 of 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Identification Evidence, Criminal Appeals, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacob Mukunga
Appellant
Shem Abienda Omondi
Appellant
Stephen Mururi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants were properly identified as the perpetrators of the robbery with violence.
- 2 Whether the conviction was safe based on the evidence presented.
- 3 Whether the appellants' defences were properly considered.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellants were positively identified as the persons who attacked and robbed the complainant. The identification was immediate, corroborated by the recovery of the stolen items, and supported by the testimony of both the complainant and police officers. The court was satisfied that there was no possibility of error or mistaken identity. The appellants' denials were considered and rightly rejected. Consequently, the conviction and sentence by the trial court were upheld as the prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeals by Jacob Mukunga, Shem Abienda Omondi, and Stephen Mururi are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF ENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
APPELLATE SIDE
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.255 OF 1999
JACOB MUKUNGA…………………………..………….1ST APPELLANT
=V E R S U S=
REPUBLIC……………………………………………….….RESPONDENT
CONSOLIDATED WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.257 OF 1999
SHEM ABIENDA OMONDI……………………………2ND APPELLANT
=V E R S U S=
REPUBLIC………………………………………….……….RESPONDENT
CONSOLIDATED WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.258 OF 1999
STEPHEN MURURI…………………………………...…3RD APPELLANT
=V E R S U S=
REPUBLIC…………………………………………………..RESPONDENT
(From Original Conviction and Sentence in Criminal Case No.3896 of 1998 of the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Mombasa – Jo-Anne Siganga, Ms. – SRM)
J U D G M E N T
The Appeals No.255 of 1999, No.257 of 1999 and No.258 of 1999 were consolidated.
The 1st Appellant Jacob Mukunga (Original A.2) 2nd Appellant Shem Omondi (Original A3) and 3rd Appellant Stephen Mururi (Original A1) were convicted by the Senior Resident Magistrate Mombasa of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code and were sentenced to death. Their Appeals to this court are against conviction and sentence.
Briefly the prosecution case was that on the 4th October, 1998 at about 5. 20 a.m. PW.1 who had traveled from Nairobi over night had alighted at Malindi Bus Stage at Bondeni. At about 6 a.m. he was walking along Moi Avenue towards Standard Bank, Maritime Branch. He was confronted by a gang of 6 men who were armed with knives. They stabbed him with a knife on the forehead and robbed him of his bag which contained the items mentioned in the charge sheet. They left him bleeding and as they escaped he screamed. Members of the public who had witnessed the robbery responded and managed to arrest 3 of the robbers who are the 3 Appellants before court. While those members of the public were in the process to lynch the Appellants they were rescued by PW.2 and PW.3 Administrative Police Officers who came by. In their evidence PW.2 and PW.3 said they joined members of the public to chase Appellants from the scene of the robbery to the place where they were arrested. The bag which had been robbed from the complainant was recovered with all the items intact and were identified by the complainant as PW.2 and PW.3 escorted the Appellants to Central Police Station where they handed them over to PW.4 who re-arrested them and they were charged with this offence. The Appellants were arrested immediately after the robbery.
In their defence the Appellants denied the offence and maintained that they knew nothing about it. We have for our part re-examined the evidence relating to the identification of the Appellants as the persons who attacked and robbed the complainant and we are satisfied that the Appellants were positively identified and it was free from the possibility of error or mistake. Their denials in their defence were rightly rejected.
We have no hesitation in dismissing the appeals.
Accordingly the Appellants’ appeals are dismissed.
Dated and delivered at Mombasa this 8th day of October, 2001.
J.L.A. OSIEMO
J U D G E
G.A. OMWITSA
COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE