[2021] KEELC 2680 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2680 (KLR)

The court found that although the error in the original application was on the part of the applicant and not in the court's ruling, it is just to allow the review to enable the applicant to enjoy the fruits of her judgment. The court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Act and Rules to substitute the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2680 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jadiel Karogo M’Ithiano; Respondent: Julia Mugito
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 227 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Ruling
Outcome
application for review allowed
Legal Topics
Review of Court Orders, Land Subdivision, Role of Land Registrar, Role of District Surveyor
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Review of Court Orders Land Subdivision Role of Land Registrar Role of District Surveyor

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jadiel Karogo M’Ithiano

Appellant

Julia Mugito

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Review of Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the court should review its ruling to substitute the Meru Land Registrar with the Meru District Surveyor for purposes of effecting subdivision of the suit land.
  2. 2 Whether the error in the original application justifies the review sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the error in the original application was on the part of the applicant and not in the court's ruling, it is just to allow the review to enable the applicant to enjoy the fruits of her judgment. The court exercised its discretion under the Civil Procedure Act and Rules to substitute the Meru Land Registrar with the Meru District Surveyor for the purpose of effecting the subdivision of the suit land, as the Land Registrar does not have the mandate to effect subdivisions, which is the responsibility of the District Surveyor. The application for review was therefore allowed.

Court Disposition

application for review allowed

Orders

  • The order in paragraph 13(d) of the ruling dated 3rd December 2019 is reviewed by substituting 'Meru Land Registrar' with 'Meru District Surveyor'.
  • No order as to costs.