[2016] KEHC 3340 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3340 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent had failed to comply with the judgment delivered on 17th November, 2014, specifically by refusing to execute the necessary transfer documents for the land parcels in question. To give effect to its earlier judgment and prevent further delay or frustration of justice, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 3340 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jadiel Kirongo M'Ithiano; Respondent: Julius Gatobu M'Ithiano
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal 227 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Enforcement
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Land Transfer, Execution of Judgment, Removal of Encumbrances
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Land Transfer Execution of Judgment Removal of Encumbrances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jadiel Kirongo M'Ithiano

Appellant

Julius Gatobu M'Ithiano

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Enforcement

  1. 1 Whether the court should enforce its judgment by ordering removal of encumbrances and facilitating transfer of land parcels as previously decreed.
  2. 2 Whether the Executive Officer should be empowered to sign transfer documents if the respondent refuses to cooperate.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent had failed to comply with the judgment delivered on 17th November, 2014, specifically by refusing to execute the necessary transfer documents for the land parcels in question. To give effect to its earlier judgment and prevent further delay or frustration of justice, the court granted orders for the removal of all encumbrances, cautions, injunctions, inhibitions, or restrictions on the specified land parcels. Furthermore, the court empowered its Executive Officer to execute all relevant documents necessary for the transfer and implementation of the judgment in the event of continued non-cooperation by the respondent. The court held that these measures...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Land Registrar is ordered to forthwith remove any encumbrances, cautions, injunctions, inhibitions and/or restrictions, if any exist, placed on Land parcel No. Nyaki Mulathankari No. 54 and Nyaki Thuura No. 1658.
  • The Executive Officer of this Court is empowered to execute all relevant documents necessary for the implementation of the above order.