[2014] KEELC 654 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 654 (KLR)

The court found that the extracted order, which included the word 'trespassing', materially differed from the judge's original interim order and was therefore illegal and without force of law. The inclusion of 'trespassing' in the extracted order enabled the applicant to forcibly evict the respondents from the suit...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELC 654 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jaguar Petroleum Company Limited; Defendant: Brighton Foods Limited; Defendant: Fusion Foods Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Suit 240 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Restoration of Possession
Outcome
Interim orders granted; respondents restored to possession; investigation ordered into extraction of unlawful order.
Judges
SN Mukunya
Legal Topics
Landlord Tenant Disputes, Interlocutory Injunctions, Eviction Orders, Mesne Profits, Court Order Extraction, Possession of Premises
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Landlord Tenant Disputes Interlocutory Injunctions Eviction Orders Mesne Profits Court Order Extraction Possession of Premises

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jaguar Petroleum Company Limited

Plaintiff

Brighton Foods Limited

Defendant

Fusion Foods Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction and Restoration of Possession

  1. 1 Whether the extracted court order exceeded the scope of the judge's original interim order.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was entitled to enforce an order that included 'trespassing' and effect eviction before inter partes hearing.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents were unlawfully dispossessed of the suit premises by use of an irregularly extracted order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the extracted order, which included the word 'trespassing', materially differed from the judge's original interim order and was therefore illegal and without force of law. The inclusion of 'trespassing' in the extracted order enabled the applicant to forcibly evict the respondents from the suit premises before the application was heard inter partes, which was not sanctioned by the court. The court held that the applicant could not continue to benefit from an unlawfully extracted order that was oppressive to the respondents. Consequently, the court ordered the immediate reopening of the respondents' premises and restoration of the status quo as of 16th September 2014,...

Court Disposition

Interim orders granted; respondents restored to possession; investigation ordered into extraction of unlawful order.

Orders

  • The premises of the respondents (petrol station and restaurant) shall be opened forthwith.
  • The respondents shall comply with the original interim orders issued by Gacheru J until further orders of this court.