[2020] KECA 112 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 112 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient reason for seeking to amend the Memorandum of Appeal, namely, that not all grounds of appeal had been included in the original document. The Court noted that there was no opposition from the respondents and that no prejudice would be occasioned to them...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 112 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Jahangir Alaudin Chanandin; Respondent: Anju Chanandin; Respondent: Dilip Kumar Partel; Respondent: Piyush Kumar Patel; Respondent: Chayaben Patel; Respondent: Lacheka Lubricants Limited; Respondent: Femida Alaudin Chananadin
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 449 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Amend Memorandum of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Memorandum of Appeal, Leave of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Amendment of Pleadings Memorandum of Appeal Leave of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jahangir Alaudin Chanandin

Appellant

Anju Chanandin

Respondent

Dilip Kumar Partel

Respondent

Piyush Kumar Patel

Respondent

Chayaben Patel

Respondent

Lacheka Lubricants Limited

Respondent

Femida Alaudin Chananadin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Amend Memorandum of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be granted leave to amend the Memorandum of Appeal to include additional grounds of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient reason for seeking to amend the Memorandum of Appeal, namely, that not all grounds of appeal had been included in the original document. The Court noted that there was no opposition from the respondents and that no prejudice would be occasioned to them by allowing the amendment. In the absence of any injustice to the other side, and in line with the established practice of the Court to permit amendments in such circumstances, the Court exercised its discretion to grant leave to amend the Memorandum of Appeal. The applicant was directed to file and serve the amended Memorandum of Appeal within 14 days in accordance with the rules.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to amend the Memorandum of Appeal to include the proposed grounds of appeal.
  • The applicant shall file and serve the amended Memorandum of Appeal within 14 days from the date of the ruling.