[2023] KEELRC 319 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 319 (KLR)

The court found that the appeal was filed 27 days outside the statutory 30-day limitation period prescribed by section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Rule 8 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Rules. The appellant did not seek or obtain leave of the court to file the appeal out of time, nor did the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 319 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Idris Jaldesa; Respondent: Adan H Hallo, Administrator Al-Falah Islamic Health Centre
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Appeal E003 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave of the court.
Judges
ON Makau
Legal Topics
Appeal Out of Time, Leave to Appeal, Limitation Periods, Striking Out Pleadings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Appeal Out of Time Leave to Appeal Limitation Periods Striking Out Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Idris Jaldesa

Appellant

Adan H Hallo, Administrator Al-Falah Islamic Health Centre

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

  1. 1 Whether the appeal was filed out of time contrary to statutory requirements.
  2. 2 Whether leave of the court was required and obtained for filing the appeal out of time.
  3. 3 Whether the appeal should be struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appeal was filed 27 days outside the statutory 30-day limitation period prescribed by section 79G of the Civil Procedure Act and Rule 8 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court Rules. The appellant did not seek or obtain leave of the court to file the appeal out of time, nor did the appellant provide any explanation for the delay or oppose the preliminary objection. Established legal principles and binding precedents require that appeals filed out of time without leave are incurably defective and must be struck out. The court therefore held that the appeal was incompetent and struck it out with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent for being filed out of time without leave of the court.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out with costs to the respondent.