[2019] KEELC 4587 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4587 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had not come to court with clean hands, having failed to pay rent for several years and seeking to use the court process to avoid their obligations. The history of the matter showed that the applicants were not vulnerable persons unlawfully evicted, but rather tenants who ceased...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4587 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Adala Maganga; Applicant: Esther Mukami Njenga; Applicant: Francis Njenga Mungai; Applicant: John Onyangi Qmbakalwa; Applicant: Joseph Ochieng Abungu; Respondent: Nairobi City County; Respondent: Marion Rono
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 39 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction/conservatory Orders
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Legal Topics
Right to Housing, Right to Dignity, Injunctive Relief, Eviction Procedure
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Land and Property Right to Housing Right to Dignity Injunctive Relief Eviction Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Adala Maganga

Applicant

Esther Mukami Njenga

Applicant

Francis Njenga Mungai

Applicant

John Onyangi Qmbakalwa

Applicant

Joseph Ochieng Abungu

Applicant

Nairobi City County

Respondent

Marion Rono

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Injunction/conservatory Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the threshold for grant of injunction or conservatory orders in a constitutional petition.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants' constitutional rights to housing and dignity have been violated by the respondents' actions.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to reconnection of essential services and protection from eviction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had not come to court with clean hands, having failed to pay rent for several years and seeking to use the court process to avoid their obligations. The history of the matter showed that the applicants were not vulnerable persons unlawfully evicted, but rather tenants who ceased paying rent after being incited by a local councillor. The court held that there was no existing tenancy relationship between the applicants and the first respondent (Nairobi City County) to warrant the grant of injunctive or conservatory orders. The applicants failed to demonstrate a prima facie case or that they would suffer irreparable harm justifying the orders sought. The...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondents

Orders

  • The applicants' application for injunctive and conservatory orders is dismissed with costs to the respondents.