[2022] KEELRC 856 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 856 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice to Show Cause was properly issued due to inactivity in the matter. However, it took judicial notice of the Covid-19 pandemic's impact on court operations, which was the primary reason for the delay in prosecuting the claim. Although the claimant did not provide medical evidence for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 856 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Aggrey A. Okanga; Respondent: Mombasa Island Cargo Terminal
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 10 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution
Outcome
Suit not dismissed; claimant granted six months to prosecute claim.
Judges
AK Nzei
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Court Discretion, Covid 19 Impact on Proceedings
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Court Discretion Covid 19 Impact on Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Aggrey A. Okanga

Applicant

Mombasa Island Cargo Terminal

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Ruling on Notice to Show Cause for Want of Prosecution

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be dismissed for want of prosecution under Rule 16 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016.
  2. 2 Whether the reasons advanced by the claimant constitute reasonable cause to avoid dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice to Show Cause was properly issued due to inactivity in the matter. However, it took judicial notice of the Covid-19 pandemic's impact on court operations, which was the primary reason for the delay in prosecuting the claim. Although the claimant did not provide medical evidence for his illness, the court exercised its discretion in his favour, finding that the pandemic constituted reasonable cause for the delay. The court therefore declined to dismiss the suit, instead granting the claimant six months to prosecute the claim, failing which the suit would stand dismissed.

Court Disposition

Suit not dismissed; claimant granted six months to prosecute claim.

Orders

  • The claimant shall prosecute his claim within six months from the date of this ruling, failing which the claim shall stand dismissed.
  • The matter shall be mentioned in court on 15th February 2022 for purposes of fixing the suit for formal proof.