[2017] KEHC 8424 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 8424 (KLR)

The court found that, at this preliminary stage, there was no sufficient reason to reject the application for leave to sue as a pauper. The applicant had provided supporting documents and set out grounds for his inability to pay court fees. In accordance with Order 33 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEHC 8424 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Ewatan Ekeno; Respondent: Equity Bank (Kenya) Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 545 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Sue as a Pauper
Outcome
Application to serve respondent for hearing on pauperism granted.
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Pauper Proceedings, Leave to Sue, Loan Disputes, Breach of Contract
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Pauper Proceedings Leave to Sue Loan Disputes Breach of Contract

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Ewatan Ekeno

Applicant

Equity Bank (Kenya) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Application for Leave to Sue as a Pauper

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to institute suit as a pauper.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated inability to pay court fees as required under Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Rules.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, at this preliminary stage, there was no sufficient reason to reject the application for leave to sue as a pauper. The applicant had provided supporting documents and set out grounds for his inability to pay court fees. In accordance with Order 33 Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules, the court directed that the application be served on the respondent to allow them to present evidence regarding the applicant's alleged pauperism. The court did not make a final determination on the merits of the application but allowed the process to proceed to the next stage, ensuring procedural fairness and compliance with the rules governing pauper suits.

Court Disposition

Application to serve respondent for hearing on pauperism granted.

Orders

  • The application is to be served on the respondent for the receiving of evidence on pauperism and for hearing of any evidence by the respondent in disproof thereof.