[2019] KEELRC 2188 (KLR)
The court held that orders issued by the Scottish Court cannot be executed within Kenya unless they are first adopted and recognized by a Kenyan court, in accordance with the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act and the Constitution. The court further found that the respondents, their agents, or servants...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEELRC 2188 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Finlay (Kenya) Limited; Respondent: Elly Okongo Inganga; Respondent: Lucas Onduso Omok; Respondent: Vitalis Otieno Muga; Respondent: Rebecca Okenyuri Nyakondo; Respondent: Joice Mongere Ochoi; Respondent: Christopher Omwambia Chuma; Respondent: Getunga Masela Indinga
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 30 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Order Prior to Judgment
- Outcome
- Motion allowed in terms of Orders 1(a)-(f), 1A, 1B and 1C; costs reserved for judgment.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Judgments, Enforcement of Foreign Orders, Judicial Authority, Work Permit Requirements, Constitutional Compliance, Cross Border Evidence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Finlay (Kenya) Limited
Applicant
Elly Okongo Inganga
Respondent
Lucas Onduso Omok
Respondent
Vitalis Otieno Muga
Respondent
Rebecca Okenyuri Nyakondo
Respondent
Joice Mongere Ochoi
Respondent
Christopher Omwambia Chuma
Respondent
Getunga Masela Indinga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Order Prior to Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether orders of the Scottish Court require adoption and recognition by a Kenyan court before execution within Kenya.
- 2 Whether the respondents must comply with Kenyan procedural law before conducting locus inspections ordered by a foreign court.
- 3 Whether non-citizens executing foreign court orders in Kenya require valid work permits or special passes under Kenyan law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that orders issued by the Scottish Court cannot be executed within Kenya unless they are first adopted and recognized by a Kenyan court, in accordance with the Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act and the Constitution. The court further found that the respondents, their agents, or servants must comply with the procedural requirements of Kenyan law, specifically the High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules, before conducting any locus inspection as ordered by the Scottish Court. The court also determined that any non-citizen seeking to execute such orders within Kenya must possess a valid work permit or special pass as required by the Kenya Citizenship and...
Court Disposition
Motion allowed in terms of Orders 1(a)-(f), 1A, 1B and 1C; costs reserved for judgment.
Orders
- Orders of the Scottish Court listed in 1(a)-(f) must be adopted and recognized by this court before execution in Kenya.
- Respondents, their agents and servants must comply with the High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules, Part VII, before conducting any locus inspection.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
54 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAIROBI
PETITION NO. 30 OF 2019
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLES 162(2) (a); 165(3) (d) (ii) AND 258 OF THE CONSTITUTION
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLES 1(1); 1(3); 2(2); 94(5) AND 159(1) OF THE CONSTITUTION
IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION AND PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL) HIGH COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES 2006
IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 87(1) OF THE EMPLOYMENT ACT NO. 11 OF 2007
IN THE MATTER OF THE JUDICATURE ACT CAP. 8 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA PART VII
IN THE MATTER OF PROVISIONS OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT, CHAPTER 43 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA
IN THE MATTER OF THE KENYA CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION ACT NO. 12 OF 2011
IN THE MATTER OF ORDER 3 RULE 9 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE RULES – LEGAL NOTICE NO. 151 OF 2010
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR DECLARATORY ORDERS
BETWEEN
JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED...................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
ELLY OKONGO INGANGA.............................................1st RESPONDENT
LUCAS ONDUSO OMOK.................................................2nd RESPONDENT
VITALIS OTIENO MUGA.................................................3rd RESPONDENT
REBECCA OKENYURI NYAKONDO..............................4th RESPONDENT
JOICE MONGERE OCHOI...............................................5th RESPONDENT
CHRISTOPHER OMWAMBIA CHUMA.........................6th RESPONDENT
GETUNGA MASELA INDINGA.......................................7th RESPONDENT
ORDER
1. On 25 January 2019, James Finlay (Kenya) Ltd (Petitioner) instituted legal proceedings (amended Originating Notice of Motion was filed on 31 January 2019) against the Respondents in this Court seeking declaratory orders
1. THAT the orders issued by the ALL SCOTLAND SHERIFF PERSONAL INJURY COURT (hereinafter referred to as the Scottish Court’’’) dated 22nd November 2018 as amended on 18th December 2018 and more particularly listed below have to be adopted and recognised as orders of this Court before being executed as required by Article 159(1) of the Constitution:
(a) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG 10 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of ELLY OKONGO INGANGA against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1055 – 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
(b) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG 16 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of LUCAS ONDUSO OMOKE against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1056 - 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
(c) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG 7 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of VITALIS MUGA against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1057 - 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
(d) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG 8 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of REBECCA OKENYURI NYAKONDI against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1058 - 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
(e) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG 5 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of JOICE MONGARE OCHOI against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1052 - 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
(f) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG 11 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of CHRISTOPHER OMWAMBIA CHUMA against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1053 - 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
(g) The ORDER for Inspection Reference No. PIC PG9 – 18 dated 22nd November 2018 as amended by a subsequent ORDER dated 18th December 2018 issued by the Scottish Court in the case of GETUNA MASELA IDINGA against JAMES FINLAY (KENYA) LIMITED filed at Edinburgh in the Scottish Court under Court Ref. No. PIC – PN 1051 - 17 dated NINTH day of May 2017.
1A. THAT the Respondents their agents and or servants must abide by and observe the provisions of the High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules PART VII being part of the written laws of England applicable to Kenya by virtue of Section 3(1)(b) of the Judicature Act Cap. 8 of the Laws of Kenya before conducting any locus inspection as ordered by the Scottish Court such locus inspection having the sole purpose of collecting evidence to be used in the Scottish Court.
1B. THAT failure by the Respondents, their agents and or servants to observe the provisions set out at PART VII of the High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules will be in breach of the sovereignty of Kenya and an abuse of protocol as between the two sovereign states of United Kingdom and Kenya.
1C. THAT any execution of the Scottish Court orders before being adopted by this Honourable Court will be contrary to the legal spirit set out in the provisions of Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act Chapter 43 of the Laws of Kenya.
2. THAT the Respondents have not sought judicial authority within Kenya for the inspection visit described in the Scottish Court orders dated 22nd November 2018 as amended on 18th December 2018 and more particularly listed at paragraphs No. 1(a),(b),(c), (d), (e), (f) and (g) herein above.
3. THAT judicial authority is required under Kenyan laws for the Respondents to be able to execute orders issued by the Scottish Court.
4. THAT the Applicant will be in breach of Kenyan Constitution and the country’s legislative enactments were it to allow an inspection visit based on the Scottish Court orders to take place within its estates if such visits is not sanctioned by Kenyan judicial authority.
5. THAT in addition to the requirement of a Kenyan judicial authority to execute the Scottish Court orders dated 22nd November 2018 as amended on 18th December 2018 and more particularly listed at paragraphs No. 1(a),(b),(c),(d),(e), (g) and (f) herein any non-citizen visiting Kenya for the purposes of execution of the enlisted orders is required pursuant to Section 40 of the Kenya Citizenship Act of 2011 to be in possession of a valid work permit or be in possession of a special pass issued under the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Regulations 2012.
6. THAT should the Applicant allow any non-citizen to visit its premises for the purposes of conducting inspections envisaged in the Scottish Court orders without such non citizen being in possession of a valid work permit or a valid special pass referred to under No. 5 above the Applicant would be committing an offence under section 45(4), (5) and (6) and Section 53(1) of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act and could be liable to criminal prosecution.
7. THAT the costs of these proceedings be provided for.
2. The Respondents filed their response to the Originating Motion on 6 February 2019 and 8 February 2019.
3. On 15 February 2019, the Petitioner filed its written submissions and authorities (Supplementary List of Authorities was filed on 20 February 2019).
4. The Respondents filed their submissions and List of Authorities on 18 February 2019, Supplementary List of Authorities on 21 February 2019
5. The Motion was urged based on the record and oral submissions which the Court took on 21 February 2019 and because of the urgency which had been demonstrated, the Court has decided to issue an order ahead of delivery of judgment with reasons.
6. The Court allows the motion in terms of Orders 1(a)-(f), 1A, 1B and 1C.
7. The Court will address the question of costs in the judgment to be delivered on 28 May 2019.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 22nd day of February 2019.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Petitioner Mr. Obura instructed by Obura Mbeche & Co. Advocates
For Respondents Mr. Okero instructed by Behan & Okero Advocates
Court Assistant Lindsey