[2018] KEHC 113 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was supplied with the typed proceedings and judgment on 12th June 2018 and filed the application for leave to appeal out of time only 10 days later. The court held that this period was not unreasonable, considering the need to obtain documents and instruct counsel. The court emphasized the constitutional right to access justice, which includes the right to appeal, and found that the delay was excusable and not inordinate. Consequently, the court granted the applicant 14 days from the date of the ruling to file the appeal, finding no prejudice to the respondent.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 113 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Gitonga Mbaka; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 2018
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 20 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Criminal Conviction Appeal, Extension of Time, Right of Appeal
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Gitonga Mbaka
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the judgment of the lower court.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was reasonable and excusable under the law.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was supplied with the typed proceedings and judgment on 12th June 2018 and filed the application for leave to appeal out of time only 10 days later. The court held that this period was not unreasonable, considering the need to obtain documents and instruct counsel. The court emphasized the constitutional right to access justice, which includes the right to appeal, and found that the delay was excusable and not inordinate. Consequently, the court granted the applicant 14 days from the date of the ruling to file the appeal, finding no prejudice to the respondent.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is granted 14 days from today to file the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment