[2019] KEELC 4382 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4382 (KLR)

The court found that the respondent was duly served with the court order dated 26th September 2018 and had knowledge of its contents. Despite this, the respondent continued to occupy and farm the suit land in direct contravention of the order, and admitted as much in open court. The court held that the respondent's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4382 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Jalango Oware; Respondent: Isaac Ohare
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 1 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
Application allowed in part; enforcement order granted; no order as to costs.
Judges
NA Matheka
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunctive Orders, Enforcement of Judgments, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Contempt of Court Injunctive Orders Enforcement of Judgments Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Jalango Oware

Applicant

Isaac Ohare

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the respondent was served with the court order dated 26th September 2018.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent disobeyed the court order and is in contempt of court.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the orders sought for enforcement and committal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent was duly served with the court order dated 26th September 2018 and had knowledge of its contents. Despite this, the respondent continued to occupy and farm the suit land in direct contravention of the order, and admitted as much in open court. The court held that the respondent's actions amounted to contempt of court. The application for enforcement was merited, and the court granted the operative order sought by the applicant, specifically authorizing the OCS, Luanda police station, to execute the orders. No order was made as to costs.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; enforcement order granted; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The OCS, Luanda police station, is authorized to execute the court orders against the respondent.
  • No order as to costs.