[2008] KEHC 3386 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant failed to meet the principles for granting bail pending appeal. The plea was considered unequivocal as the appellant responded 'true' to the charge, and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise. The court was not satisfied that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 3386 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: James Kaboko Kamotho; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 16 of 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- MM Kasango
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Plea Procedure, Narcotic Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Kaboko Kamotho
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant should be admitted to bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the plea entered by the appellant was unequivocal.
- 3 Whether the appellant has demonstrated overwhelming chances of success on appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant failed to meet the principles for granting bail pending appeal. The plea was considered unequivocal as the appellant responded 'true' to the charge, and there was no evidence to suggest otherwise. The court was not satisfied that the appeal had overwhelming chances of success, and therefore declined to grant bail pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The Chamber Summons dated 11th January 2008 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
16 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
Criminal Appeal 16 of 2008
JAMES KABOKO KAMOTHO …………….…… APPELLANT
Versus
REPUBLIC..…………….……………………… RESPONDENT
RULING
The Chamber Summons dated 11th January 2008 seeks that the court will admit the Appellant to bail pending appeal. The Appellant was convicted on his own plea of guilty to a charge of being in possession of narcotic drug bhang contrary to Section 3(1) as read with Subsection 2(a) of the Narcotic and Psychotropic Substance Control Act No. 4 of 1994. In submission counsel for the Appellant argued that the plea was not unequivocal and further that the language of the court was not shown. In that respect counsel relied on two cases namely;
1. Adan Vs Republic (1973) EA 445
2. Kariuki Vs Republic (1984) KLR 809
In those two cases the court set out the proper procedure of taking a plea. Counsel also relied on case of SOMO vs REPUBLIC (HIGH COURT OFKENYA AT NAIROBI (TREVELYAN, J.) 3 NOVEMBER 1972) Criminal Application 105 of 1972 where it was held in part as follows:-
“The most important ground is that the appeal has an overwhelming chance of being successful: in that case there is no justification for depriving the applicant of his freedom;”
The state opposed the application. On behalf of the state it was submitted that the plea of the appellant was unequivocal. That in responding to the charge the appellant stated ‘true’ and unless contrary evidence is provided that plea was unequivocal.
Having considered the submissions made before court and the application and having considered the proceedings in the lower court I find that the Appellant has failed to meet the principles of granting bail. I therefore decline to grant the prayers sought. The Chamber Summons dated 11th January 2008 is dismissed.
DATED AND DELIVERED ON 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2008.
MARY KASANGO
JUDGE