[2019] KEELC 4769 (KLR)

[2019] KEELC 4769 (KLR)

The court found that while the applicant is elderly, evidence provided by the respondent (a letter from the Kilifi Land Adjudication Officer) established that the applicant jointly owns substantial land holdings. The applicant did not rebut this evidence. The court considered the applicant's age and means but found...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELC 4769 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: James Kaluko Kyalo; Respondent: Julius Mwangangi Mulu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal 246B of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments
Outcome
Application partially allowed.
Judges
AA Omollo
Legal Topics
Payment by Instalments, Party and Party Costs, Jurisdiction of Court, Execution of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Payment by Instalments Party and Party Costs Jurisdiction of Court Execution of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Kaluko Kyalo

Appellant

Julius Mwangangi Mulu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Payment of Decretal Sum by Instalments

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to pay the decretal sum by monthly instalments.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed instalment amount is reasonable given the applicant's means and the size of the decretal sum.
  3. 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to grant the orders sought under the cited statutory provisions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the applicant is elderly, evidence provided by the respondent (a letter from the Kilifi Land Adjudication Officer) established that the applicant jointly owns substantial land holdings. The applicant did not rebut this evidence. The court considered the applicant's age and means but found the proposed instalment of Kshs 5,000 per month unreasonable, as it would take 125 years to clear the debt. Exercising its discretion, the court allowed payment by instalments but limited this to ten equal monthly payments, with the first due by 28th February 2019 and subsequent payments on the 30th of each month. In default of any instalment, the respondent is at liberty to...

Court Disposition

Application partially allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant is allowed to liquidate the decretal sum in ten equal monthly instalments, the first payable on or before 28th February 2019 and thereafter on the 30th of every subsequent month until payment in full.
  • In default of any instalment, the respondent is at liberty to execute for any or the whole balance outstanding.