[2018] KEELRC 494 (KLR)
The court found that the claimant's employment was governed by a series of fixed term contracts, the last of which expired on 31.10.2012. The claimant's employment therefore lapsed by effluxion of time, not by unfair termination. The court further held that claims for holiday, travelling allowance, and leave pay...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 494 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: James Kiio Kyule; Respondent: Crown Industries Limited
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 1634 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed. Each party to bear own costs.
- Judges
- B Ongaya
- Legal Topics
- Fixed Term Contracts, Unfair Termination, Limitation Periods, Terminal Benefits
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Kiio Kyule
Claimant
Crown Industries Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant's employment was unfairly terminated or lapsed by effluxion of time.
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to terminal benefits, including holiday pay, travelling allowance, leave pay, compensatory damages, gratuity, and notice pay.
- 3 Whether the claims for holiday, travelling allowance, and leave pay are time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the claimant's employment was governed by a series of fixed term contracts, the last of which expired on 31.10.2012. The claimant's employment therefore lapsed by effluxion of time, not by unfair termination. The court further held that claims for holiday, travelling allowance, and leave pay were time-barred, as they constituted continuing injuries and the suit was filed outside the 12-month limitation period prescribed by section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. Additionally, the claimant was not entitled to gratuity under section 35 of the Employment Act, 2007, as he was a member of NSSF and there was no contractual provision for gratuity. As a result, all claims by...
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed. Each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- The suit is dismissed.
- Each party to bear own costs of the suit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO.1634 OF 2014
JAMES KIIO KYULE....................................................CLAIMANT
- VERSUS -
CROWN INDUSTRIES LIMITED........................RESPONDENT
(Before Hon. Justice Byram Ongaya on Friday 30th November, 2018)
JUDGMENT
The claimant filed the memorandum of claim on 18. 09. 2014 through Arati & Company Advocates. The claimant prayed for judgment against the respondent for:
a) Terminal benefits as specified in paragraph 10 being holidays for 3 years Kshs. 4, 668. 00; travelling allowance for 3 years Kshs. 29, 175. 00; leave pay for 3 years Kshs.29, 175. 00; compensatory damages Kshs.116, 700. 00; gratuity Kshs.14, 587. 00; one month in lieu of notice Kshs.9, 725. 00; and total sum being Kshs.320, 730. 00.
b) Costs of the suit.
c) Interest.
d) Any other relief as the Court may deem just.
The memorandum of response was filed on 24. 10. 2014 and an amended response filed on 18. 10. 2018 through Makori & Karimi Advocates. The respondent prayed that the suit be dismissed with costs plus interest.
There was no dispute that the parties were in a contract of service. The respondent employed the claimant initially in 2009 and the claimant’s case is that his employment was abruptly terminated on 01. 11. 2012 without notice or reason. The claimant served as a machine operator. The respondent’s case is that as at the time of termination or separation, the claimant was serving on a 2 months’ fixed term contract. The last of such contracts was running from 01. 09. 2012 to 31. 10. 2012. The claimant admitted that he signed the 2 months’ fixed term contracts which were renewable. The evidence was that the last of such contract was ending on 31. 10. 2012. On 01. 11. 2012 the claimant was told that the workers were many and his contract was not renewed. The renewal clause stated, “This contract will expire on 31. 10. 2012. The management will reserve the right to renew or not to renew depending on business environment and your previous work performance and conduct. This contract also serves as notice to terminate the employment contract as the expiry period mentioned above.”
The respondent’s case was that after pay on 31. 10. 2012 the claimant never reported back to work.
The Court finds that whether the claimant was told that there was no job on 01. 11. 2012 or he absconded from work, the 2 months’ fixed contract had lapsed. The contract had lapsed by effluxion of time. Allegations of unfair termination and compensation in that regard will fail.
The Court finds that the prayers for holiday, travelling allowance, and leave pay were continuing injuries ceasing on separation on 01. 11. 2012. The claims were time barred as suit was filed outside the 12 months of limitation under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claimant was a member of NSSF and in absence of any other contractual justification he is not entitled to gratuity under section 35 of the Employment Act, 2007.
In conclusion, judgment is hereby entered for the respondent for dismissal of the suit with orders each party to bear own costs of the suit.
Signed, dated and delivered in court at Nairobi this Friday 30th November, 2018.
BYRAM ONGAYA
JUDGE