[2019] KEHC 11670 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11670 (KLR)

The court held that following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic, the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence was unconstitutional. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner, taking into account the 20 years...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11670 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: James Kimani Njuguna; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition 30 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Outcome
petition allowed; petitioner resentenced and released
Judges
DO Ogembo
Legal Topics
Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Death Penalty, Robbery With Violence
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Criminal Law Mandatory Sentencing Resentencing Death Penalty Robbery With Violence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Kimani Njuguna

Petitioner

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence imposed under Section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic.
  2. 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing following the declaration of unconstitutionality of the mandatory death sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that following the Supreme Court's decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic, the mandatory death sentence imposed on the petitioner for robbery with violence was unconstitutional. The court exercised its discretion to resentence the petitioner, taking into account the 20 years already served, the absence of physical harm to the victim, and the petitioner's demonstrated rehabilitation and reformation. The court found that the petitioner had suffered sufficient retribution and was fit for release, and accordingly resentenced him to 20 years imprisonment, resulting in his immediate release as he had already served the full term.

Court Disposition

petition allowed; petitioner resentenced and released

Orders

  • The petitioner is sentenced to 20 years in jail, deemed served.
  • The petitioner is forthwith set free and released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held.