[2020] KEHC 8985 (KLR)
The court found that the trial magistrate expressly stated that the period the appellant spent in custody was taken into account during sentencing. The sentence of 3 years imprisonment was well below the statutory maximum of 7 years for the offence of school breaking and committing a felony therein. The disruption...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 8985 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: James Longocia Ekwom; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 36 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Remand Period Credit, School Breaking, Theft, Penal Code Section 306a
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Longocia Ekwom
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court failed to consider the period the appellant spent in remand when sentencing.
- 2 Whether the sentence of 3 years imprisonment was manifestly harsh or excessive.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial magistrate expressly stated that the period the appellant spent in custody was taken into account during sentencing. The sentence of 3 years imprisonment was well below the statutory maximum of 7 years for the offence of school breaking and committing a felony therein. The disruption caused to the school and its pupils justified the sentence imposed. There was no evidence that the sentence was harsh or excessive. The appeal against sentence was therefore without merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI
CRIMINAL APPEAL 36 OF 2017
(From original Sentence dated 20/1/2017 in Nanyuki CM Criminal Case No 159 of 2016 – W J Gichimu, PM)
JAMES LONGOCIA EKWOM...............................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..............................................................................RESPONDENT
J U D G M E N T
1. The Appellant herein, JAMES LONGOCIA EKWOM (1st accused in trial court), was convicted of one count of school breaking and committing a felony thereincontrary to section 306(a) of the Penal Code. The felony committed was theft of various items. He was sentenced to 3 years imprisonment on 20/01/2017.
2. The Appellant has appealed only against the sentence. Two of his co-accused were similarly convicted and sentenced. They also appealed, but they abandoned their appeals after they were released while serving sentence. The 4th accused was acquitted.
3. I have considered the Appellant’s submissions, both written and oral, as well as those of the learned prosecution counsel for the Respondent. I have also considered the circumstances in which the offence was committed.
4. The sentence imposed upon the Appellant was lawful. He has complained only that the trial court did not take into account the period that he was in remand during his trial. This is not correct. The trial court specifically stated –
“I take into account the period the 1st Accused has been in custody…..”
5. I note that the maximum sentence for the offence the Appellant and his co-accused stood convicted of was 7 years imprisonment. They got only 3 years. The school breaking and theft therein no doubt caused unacceptable disruption in the learning of the pupils of the school. In these circumstances it cannot be said that the sentence imposed upon the Appellant was manifestly harsh or excessive.
6. I find no merit in the appeal against sentence. It is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NANYUKI THIS 17TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT NANYUKI THIS 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2020