[2001] KECA 222 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time after the original appeal was struck out for non-compliance with procedural rules. There was no evidence of dilatoriness on the part of the applicant. The merits of the intended appeal are not for determination at...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KECA 222 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Macharia Njore; Respondent: Peter Paul Mburundururi
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 61 of 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Extension of time granted for filing notice and record of appeal. Costs awarded to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Court of Appeal Rules
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Macharia Njore
Applicant
Peter Paul Mburundururi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and the record of appeal.
- 2 Whether there was any dilatoriness on the part of the applicant in making the application for extension of time.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant acted promptly in bringing the application for extension of time after the original appeal was struck out for non-compliance with procedural rules. There was no evidence of dilatoriness on the part of the applicant. The merits of the intended appeal are not for determination at this stage by a single judge. Exercising discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, the court granted the extension sought, specifying the time limits for filing the notice and record of appeal. Costs of the application were awarded to the respondent, to be paid within 30 days, failing which execution may issue.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Extension of time granted for filing notice and record of appeal. Costs awarded to respondent.
Orders
- Time for lodging the notice of appeal is extended by 7 days from the date of the ruling.
- Time for lodging the record of appeal is extended by 15 days from the date of lodging the notice of appeal within the extended time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GICHERU, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 61 OF 1998
BETWEEN
JAMES MACHARIANJORE.............................................APPLICANT
AND
PETER PAUL MBURUNDURURI................................RESPONDENT
(An application for extension of time to file a notice of appeal in an intended appeal from a Ruling of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Mbito, J.) dated 3/12/97
in
H.C.C.C. NO. 807 OF 1997) ************************
R U L I N G:
In this application, the applicant is seeking extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and the record of appeal. The applicant's originalCivil Appeal NO. 289 of 1997was struck out by this Court on 16th March, 1998 for the reason that the record of that appeal did not comply withrule 85(1)(f) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The present application was made on 19th March, 1998. There was therefore no dilatoriness in making the application.
Counsel for the respondent argues that the applicant's intended appeal is frivolous and on account of that the same should be rejected. Counsel, however, submits that if the Court was inclined to grant the applicant's application, then the costs occasioned by said application should be awarded to the respondent.
It is not for me as a single judge of this Court in an application such as the present one to determine whether or not the applicant's intended appeal is meritorious. But one thing is clear: the applicant cannot be accused of dilatoriness in making the present application. On account of this and in exercise of my discretion under rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, I grant the applicant's application so that the time for lodging the notice of appeal is extended by 7 days from today's date and the time for lodging the record of appeal is extended by 15 days from the date of lodging the notice of appeal within the extended time. The costs occasioned by the applicant's application assessed at K.Shs. 3,000/- are awarded to the respondent and should be paid to him within the next 30 days from the date hereof failing which execuDtaitone d toa nden sdueel.ivered
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 26th day of April, 2001.
J.E. GICHERU .............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR