[2013] KECA 303 (KLR)

[2013] KECA 303 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in bringing the application for extension of time was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained by the applicants. The explanations provided, including the transfer of the lower court file and awaiting proceedings, did not constitute sufficient reasons for the delay. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KECA 303 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Migwi; Applicant: Jane Wangechi; Respondent: Susan Wanjiku Mwangi
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 229 of 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Judges
ARM Visram
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Discretion of Court
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Discretion of Court

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Migwi

Applicant

Jane Wangechi

Applicant

Susan Wanjiku Mwangi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Notice and Record of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have provided sufficient reason for the delay in filing the notice and record of appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the discretion to extend time under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules should be exercised in favour of the applicants.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in bringing the application for extension of time was inordinate and not satisfactorily explained by the applicants. The explanations provided, including the transfer of the lower court file and awaiting proceedings, did not constitute sufficient reasons for the delay. The court applied the principles set out in Leo Sila Mutiso v. Rose Hellen Wangari Mwangi, considering the length and reason for the delay, and concluded that there was no merit in the application. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion against the applicants and disallowed the application with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the respondent

Orders

  • The application for extension of time to file and serve notice and record of appeal out of time is disallowed.
  • Costs awarded to the respondent.