[2021] KEELRC 1162 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1162 (KLR)

The court determined that, despite the advanced stage of proceedings and the respondent having already filed submissions, procedural fairness and the right to be heard require that the petitioner be granted an opportunity to respond to the respondent's Notice of Motion application. The mention scheduled for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1162 (KLR)
Parties
Petitioner: James Muriithi Njogu; Respondent: The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Advisory Board
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E083 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Ruling
Outcome
interlocutory_orders_issued
Judges
AN Makau
Legal Topics
Fair Administrative Action, Right to Fair Hearing, Public Service Employment, Constitutional Rights
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Fair Administrative Action Right to Fair Hearing Public Service Employment Constitutional Rights

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Muriithi Njogu

Petitioner

The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Advisory Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the petitioner was denied constitutional and statutory rights in employment.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's application to re-open the matter should be allowed at this stage of proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that, despite the advanced stage of proceedings and the respondent having already filed submissions, procedural fairness and the right to be heard require that the petitioner be granted an opportunity to respond to the respondent's Notice of Motion application. The mention scheduled for the following day is deferred to allow the petitioner 14 days to file a response. The matter will be mentioned before the Deputy Registrar to confirm compliance, and the application will be heard in the next court term. Directions regarding the disposal of the petition will be issued after the hearing of the application. This approach upholds the principles of fair hearing and...

Court Disposition

interlocutory_orders_issued

Orders

  • The petitioner is granted 14 days to file a response to the respondent's Notice of Motion application.
  • Mention before the Deputy Registrar on 12th August, 2021 to confirm filing of the response.