[2020] KEHC 2307 (KLR)
The appellate court found that the sentence of fifteen years imprisonment was neither harsh nor excessive given the violent circumstances of the rape, the breach of trust by the appellant, and his lack of remorse. The sentence was within the statutory limits prescribed by the Sexual Offences Act. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 2307 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: James Muriungi Matumbi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 115 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Sexual Offences Act, Sentencing Principles, Violent Crime
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Muriungi Matumbi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of fifteen years imprisonment for rape was manifestly harsh or excessive.
- 2 Whether there was any basis for the appellate court to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court found that the sentence of fifteen years imprisonment was neither harsh nor excessive given the violent circumstances of the rape, the breach of trust by the appellant, and his lack of remorse. The sentence was within the statutory limits prescribed by the Sexual Offences Act. The court emphasized the gravity of the offence and the need for deterrence, concluding that there was no justification to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal against sentence is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NANYUKI
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 115 OF 2017
JAMES MURIUNGI MATUMBI..........................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..........................................................................................RESPONDENT
(Appeal from original Sentence dated 10/07/2017 in Nanyuki CM Sexual Offence Case No.30 of 2015 – W.J. Gichimu, PM)
J U D G M E N T
1. The Appellant herein JAMES MURIUNGI MATUMBI was convicted after trial of rape contrary to section 3(1) (a) & (3) of the Sexual Offences Act, 2006. On 10/07/2017 he was sentenced to serve fifteen (15) years imprisonment. He has appealed only against the sentence; he stated to this court on a number of occasions that he was satisfied with the conviction.
2. The Appellant was a boda-boda rider. He took the complainant and her husband to hospital on his motor-bike taxi. After treatment of the complainant, the complainant’s husband paid the Appellant fare to take the complainant back home while he set off to travel to Embu.
3. On the way the Appellant diverted into a forest where, under threat of death, he violently raped the complainant.
4. There is probably no greater violation of a woman’s humanity, honour, dignity and self-worth than rape, particularly where it is accompanied by violence. That is why the law takes such a serious view of the offence; the offence carries a minimum term of imprisonment of 10 years and a maximum of life imprisonment.
5. The Appellant got fifteen (15) years imprisonment, and he richly deserved it. Not only did he breach the trust bestowed upon him by the complainant and her husband; the rape was accompanied by physical violence. He showed no remorse after conviction.
6. I do not find that the sentence was manifestly harsh or excessive; it was not. This court has no reason to interfere.
7. There is no merit in this appeal against sentence. It is hereby dismissed. It is so ordered.
DATED AND SIGNED AT NANYUKI THIS 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
H P G WAWERU
JUDGE
DELIVERED AT NANYUKI THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2020