[2015] KEHC 1944 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1944 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had complied with previous court orders by depositing the balance of the purchase price for the suit property, while the respondent had failed to comply, failed to attend court, and had attempted to use the title deed for purposes contrary to the court's orders. The court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1944 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Mwanganu Mwangi; Applicant: Judith Wanjiru Mwanganu; Respondent: Peter Kamunyu Muchendu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 863 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Previous Orders and for Enforcement of Succession Orders
Outcome
Application allowed; previous orders amended and enforced in favour of the applicants.
Judges
MW Muigai
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Administration of Estates, Land Transfer, Title Deeds, Court Orders Enforcement
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Administration of Estates Land Transfer Title Deeds Court Orders Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Mwanganu Mwangi

Applicant

Judith Wanjiru Mwanganu

Applicant

Peter Kamunyu Muchendu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application to Amend Previous Orders and for Enforcement of Succession Orders

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to enforcement and amendment of previous court orders regarding the suit property.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's actions in using the title deed to secure a bank loan are lawful given the pending succession proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants should be allowed to build on and access the suit property pending final transfer.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had complied with previous court orders by depositing the balance of the purchase price for the suit property, while the respondent had failed to comply, failed to attend court, and had attempted to use the title deed for purposes contrary to the court's orders. The court determined that the applicants were entitled to enforcement and amendment of the orders to allow them to build a semi-permanent house and to proceed with the transfer of the property. The court further ordered the revocation of any title deed issued in the respondent's name for purposes of securing a loan, and directed the Land Registrar to recognize the valid title as previously...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; previous orders amended and enforced in favour of the applicants.

Orders

  • The applicant is allowed to build a semi-permanent house on the purchased land for the family to settle in.
  • The respondent to come to court for an order to collect the balance of the purchase price deposited by the applicants as per the court order of 30th April 2015 and to allow the applicants free use and access to the suit property.