[2020] KEELRC 1388 (KLR)
The court found that the Claimant's employment was terminated verbally without notice, hearing, or a dismissal letter, and the Respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or rebut the Claimant's evidence. The Employment Act, 2007 requires written notice and a fair hearing before termination, and the employer...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELRC 1388 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: James Mwangi; Respondent: Marula Power Post Plant Ltd
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2226 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed. Judgment for the Claimant.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Termination, Notice of Termination, Service Pay, Leave Entitlement, Certificate of Service
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Mwangi
Claimant
Marula Power Post Plant Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of the Claimant's employment was unfair.
- 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair termination.
- 3 Whether the Claimant is entitled to pay in lieu of notice, accrued leave, and service pay.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Claimant's employment was terminated verbally without notice, hearing, or a dismissal letter, and the Respondent failed to participate in the proceedings or rebut the Claimant's evidence. The Employment Act, 2007 requires written notice and a fair hearing before termination, and the employer bears the burden of proving valid reasons for dismissal. The Respondent's failure to comply with these statutory requirements rendered the termination unfair. The Claimant was therefore entitled to compensation for unfair termination, salary in lieu of notice, accrued leave, service pay, and a certificate of service. The court awarded the Claimant the sums claimed, finding the...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed. Judgment for the Claimant.
Orders
- The termination of the Claimant's employment is declared unfair.
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs 59,000 as compensation for unfair termination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
52 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2226 OF 2015
JAMES MWANGI...............................................CLAIMANT
V
MARULA POWER POST PLANT LTD.....RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. James Mwangi (Claimant) was employed as a watchman on 9 February 2012 by Marula Power Post Plant Ltd (Respondent).
2. On 15 December 2015, the Claimant sued the Respondent alleging unfair termination of employment and breach of contract.
3. An affidavit of service filed in Court on 24 June 2016 attested to service of Summons upon the Respondent’s Accountant called Muema Kithaka on 12 February 2016.
4. Despite the said Accountant accepting service and stamping in acknowledgement, the Respondent did not enter Appearance or file a Response.
5. On 19 September 2017, the Court directed that the Cause proceed undefended.
6. When the Cause came up for hearing on 3 December 2018, the Claimant and advocate were not in Court and the Court dismissed the Cause.
7. Upon application by the Claimant, the Court reinstated the Cause on 6 November 2019, and this paved the way for hearing on 10 December 2019.
8. Although the Respondent acknowledged service of hearing notice on 22 October 2019, it did not attend the hearing.
9. The Claimant gave sworn testimony and filed submissions on 16 January 2020.
10. The Court has considered the pleadings, evidence and the submissions on record.
Unfair termination of employment
11. The Claimant testified, without the testimony being rebutted or controverted that he fell ill on 26 June 2015 and was taken to Mwea Medical Centre and admitted (Discharge Summary produced).
12. Upon discharge on 5 July 2015, the Claimant testified that on reporting to the workplace, he was informed that his services were no longer required and that he was not issued with a dismissal letter. He stated that he was paid wages for June and July 2015.
13. According to the Claimant, his advocate sent a demand letter dated 21 October 2015 alleging unfair termination of employment but there was no response.
14. Section 35(1)(c) of the Employment Act, 2007 requires a written notice of termination of employment (unless it is a case of summary dismissal). Section 41 of the Act on its part envisage a hearing.
15. The Claimant’s testimony that there was no notice, hearing or dismissal letter remained unchallenged, and the Court has no option but to conclude that the verbal termination of the Claimant’s employment was unfair.
16. If at all there were valid and fair reasons to terminate the Claimant’s employment as contemplated by sections 43 and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007, the Respondent did not discharge the burden of proving the same.
Compensation and Pay in lieu of notice
17. Since the Respondent did not issue a notice of termination of employment to the Claimant, the Court finds that he is entitled to the equivalent of 1-month salary in lieu of notice (salary for June 2015 according to bank records was Kshs 11,800/-).
18. The Claimant served the Respondent for about 3 years, and in consideration of the length of service, the Court is of the view that the equivalent of 5 months gross salary would be fair.
Breach of contract
Leave
19. The Claimant sought Kshs 25,200/- on account of 21 days leave.
20. At least 21 days leave with full pay is a statutory entitlement to every employee and relying on section 10(3) & (7) of the Employment Act, 2007, the Court will allow this head of the claim for an equivalent of 1-month’s salary.
Service pay
21. There was no evidence that the Claimant was a member of the National Social Security Fund or a pension and, therefore, by dint of section 35(5) & (6) of the Employment Act, 2007, the Claimant is eligible for service pay as part of the contract.
Certificate of Service
22. A certificate of service is a statutory entitlement. The Respondent should issue one within 21 days.
Conclusion and Orders
23. The Court finds and declares that the termination of the Claimant’s employment was unfair, and further that the Respondent was in breach of contract.
24. The Claimant is awarded
i. Compensation Kshs 59,000/-
ii. Salary in lieu of notice Kshs 11,800/-
iii. Accrued leave Kshs 11,800/-
iv. Service pay Kshs 36,000/-
TOTAL Kshs 118,600/-
25. Claimant to have costs on half scale.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nairobi on this 6th day of March 2020.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant Mr. Jaoko instructed by Achola Jaoko & Co. Advocates
Respondent did not participate
Court Assistant Judy Maina