[2018] KEHC 8270 (KLR)
The court found that although the delay of sixteen months in filing the appeal was inordinate, the applicant's explanation that he relied on his family to file the appeal, coupled with his status as a person in custody serving a life sentence, constituted sufficient cause to exercise judicial discretion in his...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 8270 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: James Mwirigi Chabari; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 4 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Sexual Offences, Conviction and Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Mwirigi Chabari
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against conviction and sentence.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was excusable under the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the delay of sixteen months in filing the appeal was inordinate, the applicant's explanation that he relied on his family to file the appeal, coupled with his status as a person in custody serving a life sentence, constituted sufficient cause to exercise judicial discretion in his favour. The court further noted that the applicant had already prepared a petition of appeal setting out several grounds, indicating a bona fide intention to appeal. In the interests of justice and considering the applicant's right to have his conviction and sentence reviewed by a higher court, the application for leave to appeal out of time was allowed.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application for leave to file an appeal out of time is allowed.
- The Petition of Appeal dated 19th December, 2017 is deemed as duly filed and served.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2018
JAMES MWIRIGI CHABARI.................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC...........................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Vide a Summons in chambers dated 19th September, 2018, JAMES MWIRIGI CHABARI has applied for leave to file an appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence inNkubu Criminal Case No. 1464 of 2014 delivered on 7th September, 2016. The application is supported by the affidavit of the applicant sworn on 4th January, 2018.
2. He swore that he had been convicted for the offence of incest contrary to section 20 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act by Hon. M. N. Idagwa on 7th September, 2016. That he was sentenced to serve life imprisonment. That he did not appeal within the 14 days stipulated time because his family had promised to file an appeal for him but they failed to do so; hence the delay. He therefore urged he be given a chance to lodge his appeal.
3. The state did not oppose the application. I have considered the affidavit in support. The decision sought to be appealed against was delivered on 7th September, 2016. The time for appeal expired on 21st September, 2016. The present application was lodged in this court on 5th February, 2017. The delay was for sixteen (16) months. The delay is inordinate.
4. I have considered that the applicant expected his family to lodge an appeal against his conviction and sentence. I have also considered that the applicant is in custody and the precarious position he finds himself in pursuing his liberty. I have seen the Petition of appeal which sets out several grounds of appeal which the applicant proposes to agitate on appeal.
5. Further to the foregoing, I have noted that the applicant is now serving a long sentence of life. Taking into consideration all the foregoing, I am inclined to exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant and give him an opportunity of having his case considered by a second court.
6. Accordingly, I allow the application. I direct that the Petition of Appeal dated 19th December, 2017 be deemed as duly filed and served. An appeal file be opened and the number thereof together with this ruling be served upon the applicant who is in custody.
It is so ordered.
DATED and DELIVERED this 20th day of February, 2018.
A. MABEYA
JUDGE