[2021] KEELC 2892 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the Covid-19 pandemic and related movement restrictions, which prevented them from learning of the judgment in time. The absence of opposition from the respondents and the relatively prompt action upon...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 2892 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Ngatia Wachira; Applicant: Elijah Macharia Wachira; Respondent: Titus Muraguri Warothe; Respondent: Lucy Wanjiru Chege
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E004 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Out of Time, Covid19 Related Delay, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Ngatia Wachira
Applicant
Elijah Macharia Wachira
Applicant
Titus Muraguri Warothe
Respondent
Lucy Wanjiru Chege
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment and decree of the trial court.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained by the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the Covid-19 pandemic and related movement restrictions, which prevented them from learning of the judgment in time. The absence of opposition from the respondents and the relatively prompt action upon discovery of the judgment further supported the exercise of judicial discretion in the applicants' favor. The court held that the explanation for the delay was not unreasonable and that the interests of justice would be served by granting leave to appeal out of time, subject to the applicants filing and serving their memorandum of appeal within 14 days.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Leave is granted to the applicants to lodge an appeal out of time against the judgment and decree of the trial court in Nyeri CMCC No. 206 of 2018.
- The applicants shall file and serve their memorandum of appeal within 14 days from the date hereof, failing which the leave shall lapse.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT NYERI
ELC MISC. NO. E004 OF 2020
JAMES NGATIA WACHIRA ...............................................................1ST APPLICANT
ELIJAH MACHARIA WACHIRA ......................................................2ND APPLICANT
VERSUS
TITUS MURAGURI WAROTHE .................................................... 1ST RESPONDENT
LUCY WANJIRU CHEGE...............................................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. By a notice of motion dated 26th November, 2020 expressed to be based upon Article 159 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, Sections 3A, 75, 79Gand 95of theCivil Procedure Act (Cap. 21), Order 51 rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all enabling provisions of the law, the Applicants sought leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment and decree of the trial court in Nyeri CMCC No. 206 of 2018 dated 9th April, 2020.
2. The application was based upon the grounds set out on the face of the motion and the contents of the supporting affidavit sworn by the 1st Applicant, James Ngatia Wachira, on 26th November, 2020 and the exhibits thereto. The Applicants contended that they were unaware of the delivery of judgment on 9th April, 2020 due to restrictions on movement imposed at the material time due to Covid-19 pandemic. They contended that they only became aware of the judgment in October, 2020 whereupon they took steps to file the instant application in November, 2020. It was their contention that the failure to lodge an appeal on time was occasioned by circumstances beyond their control. They consequently asked the court to grant the application.
3. There is no indication on record to show that Respondents ever filed a response to the application despite service. There is on record an affidavit of service sworn by a process server on 22nd March, 2021 indicating that the Respondents were duly served with the application on 22nd March, 2021.
4. The court has considered the Applicants’ notice of motion dated 26th November, 2020 together with the supporting affidavit. The court notes that there is no opposition to the application. The court is aware that the power of the court to grant or decline the application is discretionary. However, such discretion ought to be exercised judiciously. In the case of Thuita Mwangi v Kenya Airways Limited [2018] eKLRit was held, inter alia, that:
It is well settled that the decision whether or not to extend time for appealing is essentially discretionary. It is also well settled that in general the matters which this court takes into account in deciding whether to grant an extension of time are: first; the length of the delay; secondly; the reason for delay; and thirdly; (possibly) the chances of the appeal succeeding if the application is granted.”
5. The court has considered the period of delay and the explanation advanced for the delay to file an appeal on time. The court is of the opinion that the explanation rendered is not unreasonable even though the Applicants could, perhaps, have been more diligent. The court accepts that the prevailing Covid-19 situation could have prevented the Applicants from knowing the date of delivery of the judgment. Accordingly, the court is inclined to grant the application for leave on terms.
6. The upshot of the foregoing is that the court finds merit in the Applicants’ application. Consequently, the notice of motion dated 26th November, 2020 is hereby allowed in the following terms:
(a) Leave be and is hereby granted to the Applicants to lodge an appeal out of time against the judgment and decree of the trial court in Nyeri CMCC No. 206 of 2018.
(b) The Applicants shall file and serve their memorandum of Appeal within 14 days from the date hereof in default of which the leave shall lapse.
(c) There shall be no order as to costs on the application.
Orders accordingly.
Ruling datedandsignedin chambers atNyeriand deliveredvia Microsoft Teams platform this16thday of June 2021.
In the presence of:
Ms Nanjala holding brief for Mr. Ombongi for the Applicants
No appearance for the Respondents
Court assistant - Wario
……….…………
Y. M. ANGIMA
ELC JUDGE