[2015] KEHC 6862 (KLR)
The court held that the application was without merit because the appeal had already been determined and no further appeal was filed. The applicant introduced a new issue unrelated to the concluded appeal and failed to establish any legal interest in the deceased's estate beyond mere occupation of the land. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 6862 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Njue Nyaga Kamanga; Respondent: Nyaga Kamanga; Respondent: Administrator Wambui Nyaga; Respondent: Ngari Kamanga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Embu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal 58 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondents
- Judges
- FN Muchemi
- Legal Topics
- Letters of Administration, Law of Succession Act, Appeal Dismissal, Citation Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Njue Nyaga Kamanga
Applicant
Nyaga Kamanga
Respondent
Administrator Wambui Nyaga
Respondent
Ngari Kamanga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Post Judgment Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can compel the widows of the deceased to take out letters of administration in a concluded appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has established sufficient interest in the deceased's estate to warrant the orders sought.
- 3 Whether the application is properly before the court given the prior dismissal of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the application was without merit because the appeal had already been determined and no further appeal was filed. The applicant introduced a new issue unrelated to the concluded appeal and failed to establish any legal interest in the deceased's estate beyond mere occupation of the land. The proper procedure for the applicant, if he considers himself an heir, is to file a citation under the Law of Succession Act, not to seek orders in a concluded appeal. The court found no basis to compel the respondents to obtain letters of administration and dismissed the application with costs to the respondents.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondents
Orders
- The application dated 30th October 2013 is dismissed with costs to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT EMBU
CIVIL APPEAL CASE NO. 58 OF 2002
JAMES NJUE NYAGA KAMANGA................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
NYAGA KAMANGA
ADMINSTRATOR WAMBUI NYAGA
NGARI KAMANGA................................................RESPONDENTS
(An appeal from the judgment of the Embu SPMCC No. 57 of 1982 delivered on 18/5/2001)
R U L I N G
In the application dated 30th October 2013 the applicant James Kamanga Nyaga seeks for the following orders:-
This Honourable Court be pleased to order EUNICE WAKARIRU NGARI and ELIZABETH WAMBURA being the widows of the Respondent to take out Letters of Administration in order to appoint an Administrator to the Estate of the deceased within 30 days.
Costs of this application be provided for.
In his affidavit the applicant states that the deceased one Nyaga Kamanga died in 2011 and was survived by his two wives Eunice Wakariru Ngari and Elizabeth Wambura who have not taken action towards applying to be appointed the personal representatives of the deceased. The applicant states that he lives on the deceased's parcel of land NGARIAMA/NGIRIAMBU/116 with the two widows and that they now want to evict him, yet they have not moved to be appointed personal representatives of the deceased.
The respondents oppose the application in the affidavit of Eunice Wakariru Ngari sworn on 20/2/2014. It is deponed that the appeal against their husband was dismissed by Khaminwa, J on 24/1/2007 following which the deceased filed an application for removal of the inhibitions and cautions placed by the respondents in respect of NGARIAMA/NGIRIAMBU/116. The applicant ought to have filed an appeal if he was not satisfied with the judgment of the High Court. The respondents argue that the applicant has not given any reason why he wants the respondents compelled to obtain letters of administration. In his supplementary affidavit, the applicant explains the reason behind his application. He states that he has learnt that the widows are secretly disposing of the deceased's estate.
The history leading to this application is that the applicant's parents Wambui Kamanga now deceased lost her claim against the deceased in Embu Resident Magistrate Civil Case No. 57 of 1982 where the judgment was delivered on 18/5/2001. An appeal against the judgment was filed in the High Court Civil Appeal No. 58 of 2001 which was dismissed by Khaminwa, J on 24/01/2007. It appears that no appeal was filed against this judgment in the Court of Appeal.
Thereafter, the applicant substituted his mother Wambui Kamanga who died on 23/4/2003. The applicant applied unsuccessfully to set aside the judgment in HCCA 58 of 2001 in his application dated 9th August 2012. He later filed this application seeking to have the widows of the deceased compelled to take out letters of administration intestate.
It is not in dispute that the appeal in this case was dismissed on 24/7/2007 and that no appeal was preferred against the judgment. The applicant has now introduced a totally new subject in this appeal. He has not explained how his application is related to the already determined appeal. The reason he has advanced that the deceased's estate is being disposed of by the respondents is neither here nor there. This is because he has not explained the interest he has in the estate of the deceased apart from mentioning that he lives on the deceased's land.
I am in agreement with the respondent that if the applicant considers himself an heir of the deceased's estate, the correct procedure to follow is to file a citation under the law of succession Act and cite the respondents. This appeal having been determined and no appeal preferred cannot be re-opened for determination of unrelated issues.
I find that the application has no merit and I dismiss it with costs to the respondents.
DELIVERED, SIGNED AND DATED AT EMBU THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.
F. MUCHEMI
JUDGE
In the presence of:-
Ms. Muriuki for Ms. Muthoni for Respondent
Applicant in person
F. MUCHEMI
JUDGE