[2021] KEHC 3903 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 3903 (KLR)

The court held that in the absence of the lower court record or any evidence showing that the applicant was not released on bail or did not abscond, it could not grant the orders sought. The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof required to justify sentence review under Section 333(2) of the Criminal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 3903 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: James Odongo Owala; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Constitutional Application E086 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Application
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Remand Period Credit, Sexual Offences, Application of Section 333 2, Conviction Without Appeal
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Remand Period Credit Sexual Offences Application of Section 333 2 Conviction Without Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Odongo Owala

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in remand deducted from his sentence under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. 2 Whether sufficient evidence was provided to show the applicant was not released on bail or did not abscond during trial.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that in the absence of the lower court record or any evidence showing that the applicant was not released on bail or did not abscond, it could not grant the orders sought. The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof required to justify sentence review under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Consequently, the application was dismissed for want of supporting evidence.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for sentence review is dismissed.
  • The file is marked as closed.