[2012] KEHC 850 (KLR)
The court determined that, given the existence of related cases involving conflicting interests over the disputed property (motor vehicles), and the need for further information possibly through oral evidence, it would be prejudicial to address substantive issues of ownership or jurisdiction at this stage. To...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 850 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: James Omare Oino; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 497 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part; orders for preservation of subject matter and issuance of summons to investigating officers granted; costs in the cause.
- Judges
- A Mbogholi-Msagha
- Legal Topics
- Preservation of Property, Pending Appeal, Summons of Witnesses, Jurisdictional Conflict
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Omare Oino
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the subject matter of the pending appeal should be preserved pending determination of related cases.
- 2 Whether summons should issue to investigating officers to clarify the status of the disputed property.
- 3 Whether the court should address the issue of jurisdiction at this interlocutory stage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that, given the existence of related cases involving conflicting interests over the disputed property (motor vehicles), and the need for further information possibly through oral evidence, it would be prejudicial to address substantive issues of ownership or jurisdiction at this stage. To prevent prejudice and ensure fairness, the court ordered preservation of the subject matter pending the outcome of the related cases. Additionally, the court found it prudent to summon the investigating officers to provide clarity on the status of the property, as their testimony may be key to resolving the dispute. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part; orders for preservation of subject matter and issuance of summons to investigating officers granted; costs in the cause.
Orders
- The subject matter of the pending appeal (motor vehicles) is to be preserved pending hearing and determination of HCCC No. 268 of 2011 and High Court Petition No. 349 of 2012, whichever is determined first.
- Summons to issue to Mr. Isa Mohamed and Justus Munyasia (investigating officers) to appear in court on a date to be agreed among the parties to clarify the status of the subject matter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 497 of 2012 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-US X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]
JAMES OMARE OINO ………………..........…………………… APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………………………………………………… RESPONDENT
RULING
This is an application by way of Notice of Motion under Sections 354 (d) and 144 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Articles 40 (1) and 159 (2) (d) of the Constitution seeking orders that the subject matter of a pending appeal be preserved and that summons be issued to the investigating officers Mr. Isa Mohamed and Justus Munyasia attached to Embakasi Poice Station to confirm the current status of the subject matter of the appeal.
The grounds upon which this application is based are set out on the face of the application alongside an affidavit sworn by James Omare Oino. The application is opposed by the Republic and also the interested party who came on board on learning of the lodging of this application.
The court having made an order that the application be addressed by way of written submissions all parties herein complied. I have gone through the submissions and heard the learned counsel on record. Apart from the present application, there is HCCC no. 268 of 2011 and High Court petition No. 349 of 2012. In all these cases, there are conflicting interests expressed by the parties in respect of the disputed property. This property comprises of several Motor Vehicles.
In the submissions filed, it is clear there is required more information, probably by way of oral evidence to determine the central issues. It will be extremely prejudicial to delve into the issue of ownership of the subject matter at this stage as appears to have been addressed by the learned counsel appearing for the parties herein.
I have also restrained myself from addressing the issue of whether or not this matter lies in the civil or criminal jurisdiction. This is because the end result would still be the same and so, considering the pendance of the litigation I have cited hereinabove, I consider it fair and just to make an order to preserve the subject matter pending the hearing and determination of the above cases whichever comes first. It is prudent to summon the officers cited in prayer No. 3 of the Notice of Motion because they may be holding the key to the resolution of this dispute.
Summons shall accordingly issue to the two officers to appear in court on a date to be agreed among the parties herein to shed light as prayed. The costs of this application shall be in the cause.
Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 29th day of November, 2012.
A.MBOGHOLI MSAGHA
JUDGE