[2022] KEELC 1063 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 1063 (KLR)

The court found that the dispute is one of encroachment on public land rather than a boundary dispute as defined by Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act, 2012. The reports from the Land Registrar and County Surveyor established that the plaintiff has occupied approximately 10 acres of land reserved for prison...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 1063 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: James Onyango Oriango; Defendant: Gusii County Council; Defendant: County Government of Nyamira; Defendant: Zachariah Odida Kisima; Defendant: Patrick Monari; Defendant: Hedson Nyali; Defendant: Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 95 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Dispute / Interlocutory Ruling on Survey and Evidence Before Full Hearing
Outcome
Interlocutory order; matter to proceed to full hearing.
Judges
CM Kamau
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Public Land Encroachment, Boundary Delineation
Source Language
en
Land and Property Adverse Possession Public Land Encroachment Boundary Delineation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Onyango Oriango

Plaintiff

Gusii County Council

Defendant

County Government of Nyamira

Defendant

Zachariah Odida Kisima

Defendant

Patrick Monari

Defendant

Hedson Nyali

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Dispute / Interlocutory Ruling on Survey and Evidence Before Full Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to ownership of 9 hectares out of NORTH MUGIRANGO/MAGWAGWA II/403 by adverse possession or ancestral claim.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has unlawfully encroached on public land reserved for prison development.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute is a boundary dispute under Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act, 2012.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the dispute is one of encroachment on public land rather than a boundary dispute as defined by Section 18(2) of the Land Registration Act, 2012. The reports from the Land Registrar and County Surveyor established that the plaintiff has occupied approximately 10 acres of land reserved for prison development, which is public land, and that his own parcel is separated from the disputed land by an access road. The court ruled that these reports form part of the evidence and that the matter should proceed to full hearing, with parties at liberty to call the makers of the reports for cross-examination. No final determination on ownership or entitlement was made at this stage.

Court Disposition

Interlocutory order; matter to proceed to full hearing.

Orders

  • The Land Registrar and County Surveyor, Nyamira, to file their reports and sketch map delineating boundaries of the relevant parcels.
  • Reports to form part of the evidence in the case.