[2018] KEELC 3153 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3153 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff's application was unopposed and, upon consideration of the supporting affidavit and annexures, allowed the application as prayed with costs to the Plaintiff. The absence of opposition and the sufficiency of the Plaintiff's supporting documents justified granting the interlocutory...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3153 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: James Reriani Gachagua; Defendant: Hon. Attorney General; Defendant: Permanent Secretary (Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government); Defendant: Inspector General of Police; Defendant: Chairman (C.D.F) Embakasi West Constituency; Defendant: Hon. George Theuri (M.P. Embakasi West); Defendant: Hon. Martin Kinyanjui (M.C.A Mowlem Ward); Interested Party: Equity Bank Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 234 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application allowed as unopposed with costs to the Plaintiff.
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Notice of Motion, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Interlocutory Injunctions Notice of Motion Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Reriani Gachagua

Plaintiff

Hon. Attorney General

Defendant

Permanent Secretary (Ministry of Interior & Co-ordination of National Government)

Defendant

Inspector General of Police

Defendant

Chairman (C.D.F) Embakasi West Constituency

Defendant

Hon. George Theuri (M.P. Embakasi West)

Defendant

Hon. Martin Kinyanjui (M.C.A Mowlem Ward)

Defendant

Equity Bank Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to the interlocutory orders sought in the Notice of Motion dated 5/4/2017.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff's application was unopposed and, upon consideration of the supporting affidavit and annexures, allowed the application as prayed with costs to the Plaintiff. The absence of opposition and the sufficiency of the Plaintiff's supporting documents justified granting the interlocutory relief sought.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as unopposed with costs to the Plaintiff.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff's Notice of Motion dated 5/4/2017 is allowed as unopposed.
  • Costs awarded to the Plaintiff.