[2010] KEHC 534 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient proof that Said Bin Seif, the named defendant, is the same person as the deceased Said Bin Seif Bin Salim. The evidence presented, including the family tree and affidavit by Ali Fedha, was found to be unconvincing and lacking in authenticity. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] KEHC 534 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: James Robertson Mwarome; Plaintiff: Charo Mwanje Mbisha; Defendant: Said Bin Seif (as the administrator of the Estate of Liwali Salim Bin Khalitan, deceased)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Suit 110 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Chamber Summons to Strike Out Originating Summons
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the respondent
- Judges
- DO Ohungo
- Legal Topics
- Striking Out of Suit, Locus Standi, Administration of Estates, Abuse of Court Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Robertson Mwarome
Plaintiff
Charo Mwanje Mbisha
Plaintiff
Said Bin Seif (as the administrator of the Estate of Liwali Salim Bin Khalitan, deceased)
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Chamber Summons to Strike Out Originating Summons
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the originating summons can be maintained against a defendant alleged to be deceased.
- 2 Whether there is sufficient proof that the named defendant is the same person as the deceased administrator.
- 3 Whether the affidavit in support of the application is competent and made by a person with locus standi.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants failed to provide sufficient proof that Said Bin Seif, the named defendant, is the same person as the deceased Said Bin Seif Bin Salim. The evidence presented, including the family tree and affidavit by Ali Fedha, was found to be unconvincing and lacking in authenticity. The court emphasized that the burden of proof lies with the applicant to establish the identity and status of the defendant. In the absence of clear evidence that the defendant is deceased or that the suit was improperly instituted against a deceased person, the court held that there was no merit in the application to strike out the originating summons. The application was therefore...
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the respondent
Orders
- The Chamber Summons application dated 26th November 2009 is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MALINDI
CIVIL SUIT NO. 110 OF 2007 (OS)
JAMES ROBERTSON MWAROME
CHARO MWANJE MBISHA .............................................................................................PLAINTIFF
-VERSUS-
SAID BIN SEIF
(as the administrator of theEstate of Liwali Salim Bin Khalitan (deceased).....................DEFENDANT
RULING
The Chamber Summons application dated 26th November 2009 is made under Order VI Rule 13 (1) (d) rule 13(3) and 16 Civil Procedure Rules – section 1A and 3A of the Civil Procedure Act, seeking that the Originating Summons dated 10-12-07 be struck out. Further, that costs of this application and costs of the entire suit be borne by the plaintiffs in any event.
It is based on grounds that, the plaintiff filed the Originating Summons against the defendant who is deceased. Said bin Seif who is the administrator of the estate of Liwali Salim Bin Khalifan died on 23rd February 1999 in Muscat.
The Originating Summons having been filed against a deceased person as a non starter and must be struck out as a suit cannot lie against an estate of a deceased person, so the originating summons herein amounts to an abuse of the court process.
The application is supported by the affidavit sworn by Ali Fedha, a manager of Said Bin Seif Properties Ltd in which he states that he has worked as the manager since 2003 and is versed with the late Said Bin Seif who was also known as Said Seif Salim Busaidy. He depones that the late Said Bin Seif was appointed administrator of the Estate of Liwali Salim Bin Khalifan (deceased on 20th October 1949 as per letters of administration which are annexed and marked AF1.
Said Bin Seif died on 23-02-99 as per the death certificate marked AF2
Sometime in July 2009, Ali Fedha saw an advertisement in the Daily Nation, addressed to Said Bin Seif asking him to enter appearance in respect of the Originating Summons, Fedha immediately contacted their advocate to take up conduct of the matter and file a memorandum of appearance for the estate of Liwali Salim Bin Khalfan.
The application is opposed, and in a replying affidavit sworn by the 1st plaintiff, he states that the searches conducted at the Land Registry Mombasa and the titles indicate that the defendant is the registered proprietor of the suit property. He contests the notification of death saying the same relates to Said Seif Salaim Busaidy and not Said Bin Seif and in any event Ali Fedha has no locus to swear the supporting affidavit.
At the hearing of the application, Mr. Olaba held brief for Mr. Kiarie (who is on record for the defendant/applicant) he submits that Said bin Seif, who is sued as the administrator of the Estate of Liwali Salim died and since his death, no one has taken his place as the administrator which means that correctly, the Estate is unadministered and so no cause of action lies. As regards the different names, Mr. Olabi seeks to rely on a family tree which shows Said Seif as a member of the El Busaidy clan, so it was just the naming system and Said Bin Seif Bin Salim.
In response, Mr. Otara who acts for the respondent contests the document with the purported family tree, saying its origin is unknown, it is not signed by any party and it is not clear under whose authority it was prepared and there is nothing on record to prove that the two different names belong to one and the same person.
He terms Ali Fedha’s role in this matter as that of a busy body since he is manager of a concern which is not even a party to this suit.
The issue is really very simple – he who alleges must prove – what proof is there hat Said Bin Seif is the same person as Said Bin Seif Bin Salim who is deceased? None. It is not for the respondent to prove that the said individual is one and the same person, respondents are not the ones asserting that contested position, it’s the applicants. Indeed the origin or authorship of the purported family tree is not disclosed and an answer as to why no member of the family of Said Bin Seif found it necessary to swear an affidavit confirming the purported state of affairs, preferring to leave it to the manager of some property to do so. I am not persuaded by the bona fides of that affidavit.
There isn’t a single document produced to show that at any one time Said Bin Seif was also referred to as Said Bin Seif Bin Salim, and the argument about a naming system is being made from the bar with no evidence to support that – this court is being asked to presume that Said Bin Seif automatically adopted the names Said Bin Seif Bin Salim at death – they could well be two different individuals – one living and one dead. I am not persuaded by the arguments advanced and I find no merit in striking out the originating summons on the basis. The upshot is that the application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.
Delivered and dated this 3rd day of November 2010 at Malindi.
H. A. Omondi
JUDGE
Mr. Otara for plaintiff
Miss Obura for defendant