[2017] KEHC 2185 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case for the preservation of the suit land, as there was evidence that the defendant was cultivating and selling parts of the property despite the dispute being unresolved. The absence of any response from the defendant further supported the need for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 2185 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: James Tengele; Defendant: Simon Njuguna
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 19 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application for Preservation Orders Pending Hearing
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Status quo to be maintained. Order of inhibition granted.
- Judges
- MA Silau
- Legal Topics
- Status Quo Orders, Inhibition Orders, Fraudulent Title, Interlocutory Injunctions
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Tengele
Plaintiff
Simon Njuguna
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Application for Preservation Orders Pending Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the status quo on the suit land should be maintained pending the hearing and determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether an order of inhibition should be issued to prevent dealings with the suit land until the case is concluded.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had demonstrated a prima facie case for the preservation of the suit land, as there was evidence that the defendant was cultivating and selling parts of the property despite the dispute being unresolved. The absence of any response from the defendant further supported the need for protective orders. The court held that maintaining the status quo and issuing an order of inhibition were necessary to prevent irreparable harm and to ensure the subject matter of the suit remained intact pending final determination. The orders sought were therefore justified under the law to preserve the rights of the parties and the integrity of the judicial process.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Status quo to be maintained. Order of inhibition granted.
Orders
- Status quo on the suit land Kamara/Mau Summit Block 1/27 (Kiboko) to be maintained pending hearing and determination of the suit.
- Defendants are prohibited from selling or otherwise disposing of any part of the suit land until the case is determined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU
ELC NO. 19 OF 2015
JAMES TENGELE………..…………………………..PLAINTIFF
VERUS
SIMON NJUGUNA……………….……..………… DEFENDANT
RULING
(Application seeking to have status quo on suit land maintained; application allowed; status quo to be maintained; order of inhibition to stop any dealings also issued)
1. The application before me is that dated 30 June 2017 filed by the plaintiff. It is an application seeking to have the status quo prevailing on the land parcel Kamara/Mau Summit Block 1/27 (Kiboko) (the suit land) maintained pending hearing of the suit. The application is supported by the affidavit of the plaintiff who has averred that he is the legal owner of the suit land and that despite this matter pending in court, the defendant has gone ahead to cultivate the whole land and has been selling parts of it. He has stated that if this is not stopped he stands to suffer irreparable loss and damage. The defendant is represented by the law firm of M/s J.K Ayusa & Company Advocates, and despite the application being duly served upon this law firm, nothing has been filed to respond to the application.
2. That suit itself was commenced on 28 January 2015 by way of plaint which plaint was amended on 27 August 2015. In the amended plaint, the plaintiff has averred that he is the beneficial owner of the suit land and that he sold one acre of it to the 1st defendant. He has claimed that the 1st defendant, in collusion with the rest of the defendants, has gone ahead to process title in his name for the whole of the land. He has averred that the title of the 1st defendant has therefore been fraudulently procured. In the suit, the plaintiff has asked for orders inter alia that the title deed of the 1st defendant be revoked and for a declaration that he is the legal owner of the suit land.
3. It will be noted that all that the applicant wants in this application is for the status quo to be maintained pending hearing and determination of the suit. In his application, he has stated that the defendant is cultivating on the whole of the parcel of land and selling parts of it. I suppose that the status quo order that the applicant wants is for the property to be preserved, as it is, pending hearing and determination of the suit.
4. It has been acknowledged that the defendants are cultivating the land and that status can continue prevailing pending the hearing and determination of this case. The defendants are however stopped from any further sale of the suit land or entering into any other disposition until this case is heard and determined. In addition, I issue an order of inhibition, restricting the registration of any disposition in the register of the land parcel Kamara/Mau Summit Block 1/207 (Kiboko) until this suit is heard and determined. The costs of this application shall be costs in the cause.
5. It is so ordered.
Dated, signed and delivered in open court at Nakuru this 5th day of October, 2017.
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT NAKURU
In the presence of : -
No appearance on part of M/s Maritim Omondi Advocates for plaintiff/applicant.
No appearance on part of M/s J.K. Ayusa & Co. Advocate for the defendant/respondent.
Court Assistant : Carlton Toroitich
MUNYAO SILA
JUDGE
ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT NAKURU