[2017] KEELC 3144 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 3144 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff, as the registered owner of the suit land, had established a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The defendants, having been served, failed to appear or oppose the application. The plaintiff demonstrated that the ongoing construction and threatened eviction...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 3144 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Jamlick Ngai Mukunga (suing as the Chairman of Karimamwaro Self Help Group); Defendant: County Government of Tharaka Nithi; Defendant: David Gitonga Mwamba (sued in his capacity as Chief of Mwonge Location); Defendant: Principal Secretary Interior and National Coordination; Defendant: The Attorney General
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 222 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Outcome
Temporary injunction granted as prayed pending hearing and determination of the suit. Costs in the cause.
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Land Ownership Disputes, Compulsory Acquisition, Eviction, Trespass, Public Authority Powers
Source Language
en
Land and Property Injunctive Relief Land Ownership Disputes Compulsory Acquisition Eviction Trespass Public Authority Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jamlick Ngai Mukunga (suing as the Chairman of Karimamwaro Self Help Group)

Plaintiff

County Government of Tharaka Nithi

Defendant

David Gitonga Mwamba (sued in his capacity as Chief of Mwonge Location)

Defendant

Principal Secretary Interior and National Coordination

Defendant

The Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from constructing on or interfering with Land Parcel No. MAGUMONI/MWONGE/184 pending determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated a prima facie case with a likelihood of success and risk of irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff, as the registered owner of the suit land, had established a prima facie case for the grant of a temporary injunction. The defendants, having been served, failed to appear or oppose the application. The plaintiff demonstrated that the ongoing construction and threatened eviction would cause irreparable harm and loss that could not be adequately compensated by damages. The court was satisfied that the balance of convenience favored maintaining the status quo by restraining the defendants from further construction or interference with the land pending the hearing and determination of the main suit. Accordingly, the court granted the temporary injunction as...

Court Disposition

Temporary injunction granted as prayed pending hearing and determination of the suit. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • A temporary injunction is issued restraining the 1st and 2nd defendants, their officials, employees, servants, agents, assigns, or anyone acting on their behalf from building the Chief’s Camp and Police Administration premises or in any way interfering with the peaceful user and occupation by the plaintiff of Land...
  • Costs of the application shall be in the cause.